China tests ballistic missiles with the longest range in the world, capable of striking US or Britain with TEN nuclear warheads

中国测试世上最长射程弹道导弹,可携带10颗核弹头打击美国或英国
Jay Akbar For Mailonline

国外网友评论 0人跟帖    14883人参与

DannyUK
Abit ironic isn't it China? You condemn North Korea for testing their missiles and you go ahead and test your own which is far worse. The world is on a knife edge, it's only a matter of time which is why we can't scrap our nuclear deterrent.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Itma
Probably some of our money that's paid for that
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Donny LadReply toItma
Pro0bably you are a comedian
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Jim
This will all end badly. China developing more and more sophisticated weapons of war WHY?. The Middle East on a knife edge with Iran hating the Saudis and news this week about a secret report which the US government is sitting on and the Saudis have made threats over because it is said they gave the order for the strike on the twin towers which just like Pearl would be an act of war if true. Then we have Mr. Putin who the west see as the big bad wolf. On top of this powder keg is the world on the brink of a financial meltdown far worse than back in the 1930s and we all remember what that brought about, WW2. Oh dear, very dangerous times indeed. At a time like this Dodgy Dave has cut out forces to a boy scout outfit and if a conventional war was fought we have no PITS and next to no Steelworks. Oh yes, its another fine mess.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
indigomoonReply toJim
It's not a mess. It's all going to plan. NWO is coming to fruition.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
jose eduardo
Make no mistake all this arsenal will one day hit everybody like a flash. No winners here. But We as animal species are the most destructive lot this planet has ever had. It takes one madman and We are history. And We are heading that way...conflict is all around us. It will only get worse. And our polítical elites and leaders have a lot to answer for.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Scotty MacReply tojose eduardo
China has the right to protect itself against the turmoil created in the EU now, the Middle East because of the US stupidity.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Robot01234
And our response is to increase the Aid Budget and cut our Armed forces very cunning.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Lincoln Phipps
Quite funny how it is the US complaining that China is testing technology due to tensions in the South China Sea. It's NOT the North America Sea but the South China Sea. Meanwhile a few weeks ago back in Feb 26th the US tested two launches of Minuteman III missiles. Then the US Deputy Defense Secretary Robert Work said the approximately 15 tests conduced since January 2011 were to send a message to 'strategic rivals like Russia, China and North Korea that Washington has an effective nuclear arsenal'. If the US wasn't militarily deployed around the world interfering with regions that have nothing to do with the US, if the US wasn't funding regime changes that spectacularly fail, if the US wasn't fuelling regional conflicts with cash and weapons and troops, then we would think the US had a upper moral hand to rightfully complain rather than what appears to be a blood covered fist of dollars that the US uses to bang on the lectern of the global stage.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Kathy87Reply toLincoln Phipps
Lincoln, you are one smart gentleman.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
indigomoonReply toLincoln Phipps
It's all about the Petrodollars.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
StandupforitReply toLincoln Phipps
Lincoln - you think America should keep its nose out of "areas that don't concern it?" America is an ally of Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Philippines, Malaysia. Even Vietnam! All have problems with China's burgeoning aggression within that area. Try telling those countries that America shout "butt out and leave" - rpthat would invite chaos and Chinese dominance of every country smaller and weaker.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
OwenJ
And Corbynites want to scrap Trident.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Daveodaddeo101Reply toOwenJ
Yep, they're deluded.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Steven R
Chinese quality, it's bound to break down or change direction and blow themselves up.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
nullReply toSteven R
My father used to tell me that about the Russians during the Cold War. Turns out after the Wall fell he was indeed correct. Nothing they built ran with any efficiency or accuracy.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Whiteparish
"China tests ballistic missiles with the longest range in the world." Maybe. Everything does not get published by Jane's, you know. Besides, thirty minutes launch/coast/reenter is too long to stop the other side from launching. Then there is the issue of "Where are the Tridents slumbering?" I am not going to lose any sleep over this. It changes nothing. The situation is not good, but it has not been for generations.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
A N OtherReply toWhiteparish
Good, calm, considered comment. But I'd be worried if Corbyn ever had a say in anything other than the Village Fete.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Lord_James_of Luton
As the great Hans Bethe (who worked on the atom bomb in the Second World War) said, Submarines armed with nuclear missiles are the ultimate weapon. Nuclear powered submarines can roam the sea bed undetected for years without running out of fuel, and have weapons that can take out a city thousands of miles away.The only effective weapon against a submarine is another submarine.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
A N OtherReply toLord_James_of Luton
"Submarines armed with nuclear missiles are the ultimate weapon. Nuclear powered submarines can roam the sea bed undetected for years without running out of fuel..." Er, the crew still needs "fuel" ie, food....the moment of re-supplying is the Nuclear Sub's Achilles Heel. And listening devices are getting better by the year. But for the US traitor John Walker & his "Family Gang" the Soviets, at least, would be years behind in this particular technology. As for submarines that are effective against submarines: Think of the Russian "K" Class....relatively cheap to produce & possibly very effective against the Nuclear Submarines we depend on as our detterent...worldwide.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
I Dont Really Know
After buying all the cheap Chinese junk we have to accept that we have made the finance of these weapons possible.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
John3270Legoland
Perhaps China should join the EU. With them, germany and france owning most of the UK they have no need to threaten us with long-range weapons.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ryanhufc
And what benefit would China get by nuking the UK? Considering China has so much money invested in UK and a vital trade partner it's a stupid scaremongering story.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
dotlinkReply toryanhufc
cmon lets pick a fight with china, even if its just verbal to get the markets going
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Bunkarr
This is just two months after the Pentagon unveiled its B-21 bomber project that can bomb any place around the world, any surprise?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Meh..
Sorry, its just difficult to take a weapon called D'ong seriously..
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ItoldReply toMeh..
Until it well and truly sha fts you that is?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Trevor
Well, to be honest, we gave them the money to do this, by buying their products. The governments of the western world were told they would do this but chose to ignore it. Now we have a nation with the largest army, navy and air force in the world for "defensive" purposes.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
john heppellReply toTrevor
As opposed to the USA which I assume you infer to be offensive!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
I am not Joe King
WTF is going on in the world? It looks bad for mankind, there will be no winners in the end.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
indigomoonReply toI am not Joe King
There will. The elite will be tucked up in their bunkers.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
So Just An Hour Ago
Oh the irony! the deal which started under the coalition and continued under this present govt will see that along with the french nationalized energy company edf, china are going to be building what has already been dubbed the world's most expensive nuclear power station in the uk... no doubt to also be constructed out of their cheaper grade steel whilst having already slapped a 46% tariff on the uk produced, higher quality tata steel...
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
indigomoonReply toSo Just An Hour Ago
Absolutely. In addition, EDF has stated that the power station they intend to build has not proved that reliable.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
DrivelReply toSo Just An Hour Ago
Don't let the facts get in the way of a bogey man story
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
centerlane
And the US has more naval firepower with its subs and carriers,[ nuclear and conventional] than the rest of the world combined.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
British ExileReply tocenterlane
And a hundred years ago the Royal Navy was in the same position. It had sufficient firepower to take on all the navies in the world together and defeat them all.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Ash Land
Every 2-bit country is taking advantage of Obama. Don't know how the next president will roll this back. Only way is if Russia fly-by again, a warning and then a shoot-down if they do it again. America needs to help Japan and Taiwan build an island also in the China sea. We know the UN will complain, but then we should just cut-off funds and let China pay their way.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
niknak99Reply toAsh Land
Aren't the US behind in the UN dues.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
gman500Reply toAsh Land
Cut off funds to China??? Are you really that stupid? China is the world's factory, banker and one of the biggest consumers of goods for almost every country on the planet. The rest of us even look at them the wrong way and it spells economic ruin. They fund the West not the other way around.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]

评论

游客 请登录 注册