SOUTH CHINA SEA WATCH: Tussle over plane; Russia backs China

中国南海观察:飞机争夺战,俄国支持中国
The Associated Press

Tensions in the South China Sea are rising, pitting China against smaller and weaker neighbors that all lay claim to islands, coral reefs and lagoons in waters rich in fish and potential gas and oil reserves. China's recent construction of artificial islands in the Spratly archipelago, complete with airstrips and radar stations, and U.S. patrols challenging Beijing's vast territorial claims, have caused concern that the strategically important waters could become a flashpoint.
[CN]

中国南海附近水域富含海产资源、潜在天然气和石油储备。随着中国反对周边弱小国家宣称对南海岛屿,珊瑚礁,咸水湖拥有主权,中国南海态势加剧升温。中国新近在南沙群岛填海造地,建成飞机跑道和雷达站点。美国巡逻队挑衅北京关于这片大领土的声明,一时引起人们关注,这片战略性重要海域可能会成为战争导火索。

19784f9d174c44e98bc29b306cf03afa.jpg

e7bf46500bb3469b9f150efb0bc15232.jpg

A look at some recent key developments:[CN]

来看看近来的动态发展。

EDITOR'S NOTE: This is a weekly look at the latest key developments in the South China Sea, home to several territorial conflicts that have raised tensions in the region.

编者日记:这是中国南海近一周内的最新动态发展。该地几处领土冲突引起该地区态势紧张。

CHINA DEFENDS MILITARY PLANE LANDING[CN]

中国保护军机着陆。

China says the United States is overblowing a humanitarian emergency mission that involved one of its military planes landing on an artificial island — which also happens to be one of three recently built military outposts with long runways.[CN]

中方表示,美国过分渲染此次人道主义紧急援救 - 本次军机着陆的人工岛屿恰恰也是这条长机场跑道新建的三大屯堡之一。

The Y-8 transport aircraft made a trip to Fiery Cross Reef in the Spratlys to evacuate three injured construction workers, according to the Ministry of Defense.[CN]

运-8运输机飞抵南沙群岛的永暑礁去解救受伤的建筑工人。国防部长透露。

State Department spokesman John Kirby questioned the need for a military aircraft, citing concern that China keeps militarizing the disputed region. He said the injured workers were involved in infrastructure improvements of a military nature.

"One could argue that it's just another sign that the Chinese are willing to keep militarizing the effort in general," he told reporters.

China's Defense Ministry said it was completely within the mission of the People's Liberation Army to rescue people — and carry out construction activities and deployment of defense facilities on related islets and reefs in the Nansha Islands, the Chinese name for the Spratlys.

2016-04-25T201955Z_1007000001_LYNXNPEC3O1AF_RTROPTP_2_CNEWS-US-USA-CHINA-NAVIGAT.jpg

ebf9e0c602b04b5796a6db08b428cb09.jpg

FISHERMEN REPORT MORE CHINESE SHIPS; U.S. FLIES FIRST MISSION FROM PHILIPPINES

Filipino fishermen say they've seen more Chinese coast guard ships than usual around the contested Scarborough Shoal, which China effectively took over in 2013 after a tense standoff with Philippine vessels.

Although fishermen have been complaining they're being driven away by Chinese ships, the Philippine Department of Defense said it could not confirm an increase in Chinese presence at the shoal, 145 miles (230 kilometers) from Luzon island.

Meantime, the U.S. Air Force flew its first mission over the Scarborough area as part of a new Air Contingent force stationed in the Philippines. It involved four A-10C Thunderbolt jets and two Sikorsky HH-60 helicopters.

The mission: establishing air and maritime "domain awareness" and "assuring all nations have access to air and sea domains throughout the region in accordance with international law," according to a U.S. military statement.

Free navigation "is extremely important, international economics depends on it — free trade depends on our ability to move goods," said Col. Larry Card, commander of the Air Contingent, part of stepped-up U.S. assistance to its Philippine ally.

RUSSIA, SOME ASEAN NATIONS BACK CHINA; BRITAIN STANDS BY U.S.

As China and other claimants await the ruling of a U.N. tribunal on a case filed by the Philippines that challenges Beijing's vast territorial claims, world and regional players are lining up behind one side or the other.

China has refused to take part in the proceedings at the U.N. Court of Arbitration, and it's not clear how the ruling can be enforced.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, meeting with his Chinese counterpart in Moscow, said Russia is against any interference from third parties — a reference to the U.S. — " or any attempts to internationalize these disputes."

Russia repeated China's position that "only parties can resolve their dispute through direct talks."

Britain, on the other hand, says it will stand alongside the U.S. in supporting the ruling.

Hugo Swire, British minister of state for the Foreign Office, told a Washington think tank that growing tensions in the South China Sea are driven by China's assertive actions. He said any ruling by the court should be binding on both parties.

In Southeast Asia, which is broadly divided between pro- and anti-China blocs, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Beijing had reached a consensus with Brunei, Cambodia and Laos — its traditional allies — on the South China Sea issue.

The four countries say territorial disputes are not an issue between China and the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations and should be resolved by parties directly.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said earlier that the case filed by the Philippines is an attempt to deny China's sovereignty over the Spratly Islands and "an abuse of international law."

6169e4e666804ec4b3d63e5b47e72431.jpg

U.S. ADMIRAL DENIES RIFT WITH THE WHITE HOUSE

The Pacific Fleet commander Adm. Harry Harris has denied reports of differences with the White House in strategy over the South China Sea.

Navy Times reported on a gag order issued to military commanders for comments about the South China Sea in the run-up to the nuclear summit in Washington that included China.

Harris said in a statement that "any suggestion that the White House has sought to 'tamp down' on my talking about my concerns is patently wrong."

He said that during recent congressional testimony and press engagements in Washington, "I was very public and candid about my concerns regarding many issues in the Indo-Asia-Pacific to include the fact that China's militarization of the South China Sea is problematic."

LAST WORD

"The United States and Vietnam share the interest in maintaining peace and stability in the region. So does China. But its massive land reclamation project in the South China Sea and increasing militarization of these outposts fuel regional tension and raise serious questions about China's intentions." — U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Antony Blinken, speaking on a visit to Hanoi.

Associated Press writers Hrvoje Hranjski in Bangkok, Christopher Bodeen in Beijing, Tran Van Minh in Hanoi, Vietnam, and Jim Gomez in Manila, Philippines, contributed to this report.

Follow Hranjski on Twitter at twitter.com/hatbangkok

EDITOR'S NOTE: This is a weekly look at the latest key developments in the South China Sea, home to several territorial conflicts that have raised tensions in the region.

国外网友评论 0人跟帖    8502人参与

Clint

Will Cuba and U.S. be the next ones to claim some islands there? Washington should stay out of it, and we've got enough problems to worry about here at home and the Middle East. Let UK grind its own ax because of losing Hong Kong after stealing tons of money for 99 years by shipping opium into China by force.[CN]

古巴和美国会是下一批宣称对那边岛屿拥有主权的国家吗?华盛顿应该置身事外,我们自家门口跟中东问题就足以焦头烂额。至于英语,武力输送鸦片到中国,租借香港99年捞走大笔巨款后归还,就让它自己磨亮自己的斧头吧。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
C J

Most C.E.O.s in the U.S. identify as GLOBALISTS and don't see their companies as American companies and they are a big reason we will never go to war with China! Most GLOBALISTS think people all over the world should make the same low wages (this is a big reason for American's average wages dropping for the last 23 yrs.)! We are in a very bad situation as China makes 50% of the products we use in the U.S. and the other half have China made parts (such as circuit boards, relays, servo motors, sensors, etc. ) in them! Americans wages have been devaluated for the last 23yrs. so we have to buy China made products! If we decided to stop buying products from China tomorrow it would take 4-7 yrs. to get production plants set up in the U.S. (you can thank American C.E.O.s for giving our manufacturing to China)! If we went to war with China think tanks estimate it would take more American soldiers than desert storm (1&2), world war 1&2, and Vietnam combined! It would take TRILLIONS of dollars (remember we wouldn't be able to borrow the money from China and we wouldn't be able to print the money and keep in mind Iraq has cost us 4 trillion dollars by itself)! We would not get products from China once the conflict started (this means Walmart and most other American stores would go out of business with weeks) and this means 78% of electronics and unfortunately our military & defense rely on circuit boards and other electric products made in China! Our American C.E.O. s shipped manufacturing over to China but they have made us much more unsafe! So you figure out how to economically decouple us from China and you can talk war! Before you get to smug think about China makes more DRONES than any other country and new warfare will be you walking out of your house and the sun being blocked out by drones flying over![CN]

很多美国的总裁都是全球主义者,可不认为他们的公司就是美国的,这就是我们和美国打不起仗来的原因。很多全球主义者都认为全世界的人民都该持有相同低的工资(这就是美国工资过去23年狂降的重要原因)!我们处境很不利,因为美国使用的产品50%来是中国制造,剩下的50%产品里边也含有中国造的零部件(电路板、继电器、伺服马达、传感器等等)。美国工资过去23年一直在贬值,所以我们只能买中国货了。如果明天开始我们决定停止购买中国货,美国需要花上4-7年时间建起生产工厂(谢谢美国的总裁们,把制造业都让给了中国)。如果和中国开战,所需投入兵力比沙暴行动1&2,一战二战,越战合起来还多。要花掉上万亿美金(提醒一下:我们没法向中国借钱了,也不能自己印钱,而且想想伊拉克战争就花了我们4万亿美金!)冲突一旦发生,我们就无法收到中国货(这也意味着沃尔玛和其他美国商店在几周内无生意可做)包括78%的电子产品,很不幸我们的军队和防御依赖中国制造的电路板和其他电子产品!我们美国总裁们把制造业拱手交给中国却陷我们入更危险的境地。所以先想想怎么把我们经济同中国分离出来,不然谈个球战争!你们还不必自鸣得意,想想中国造的无人飞机比任一个国家都多,你一出门飞过的无人飞机遮住太阳,战争就爆发了。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
homer555552Reply toC J

ITS Chinese offical staregy to avoid a war "at this moment in time": with the US: BECAUSE THEY WOULD LOSE and as you say WAR COSTS BILLIONS and destroys wealth: i think thats the Chinese view[CN]

中国的官方战略是:此时此刻避免与美国发生战争。因为他们会输掉战争,你说的,战争就是撒钱,破坏财富:我认为,那就是中国人的观点。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Jibbs

Do people honestly think China cares anything about an international ruling at this point? I doubt anyone will do anything if the ruling is against China.[CN]

人们还真以为中国在这个点上会在乎国际规则吗?即便规则是针对中国,也没有人会替中国说话。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MosesReply toJibbs

Hmmm.....well, the U.S., the UK, and Russia have all had court rulings go against them and they all ignored those rulings.....and so why should China do any differently. The 5 permanent members of the U.N. security council all have veto power. The World Court which is an extension of the U.N. has no jurisdiction authority and has No power to enforce any rulings. The only thing to gain is a public opinion win which will be used as propaganda.[CN]

嗯...好吧,美国,英国,俄国都有针对他们的法庭裁决,但他们都视而不见...中国干嘛需要标新立异呢?联合国安全委员会5大常任理事国都有否决的权利。作为联合国延伸的世界法庭没有司法权,没有能力强制执行裁决。唯一拥有的权利就是赢得公众舆论作为政治宣传罢了。

China has already stated that it will not accept a third party ruling and that is their right under the accords of the U.N. Occupied island reclamation is NOT in violation of any international law.[CN]

中国发表过声明,他们不接受第三方裁决,根据联合国宪章他们有这样的权利。占领土地的开垦不违反国际法。

Regardless of U.S. chest thumping, U.S. military provocation, and 24/7 onslaught by U.S. journalists.....China and its neighbors can resolve their problems one-on-one. In the meantime there has been NO interruption of passage thru these waterways and their is no threat that there will be......China does major trade through these lanes more than anyone.[CN]

尽管美国嘴头强硬,军事上加以挑衅,还有记者每天24小时的抨击...中国和邻国可以将他们的问题逐一解决。如此一来,这些水域就不会航道的中断,威胁就会解除了...中国在这航线上的主要交易比任何一个国家都多。

This is NOT about FON, anyway. This is all about Pivot to Asia. The U.S. attempt to contain China....both with its military AND with TPP. ....and with, of course, trumped up American main-steam "journalism".[CN]

这无关领海许可,只关于重返亚洲。美国试图用军队和太平洋协议把中国牵制中国...当然了,还有通过美国主流报纸捏造口实。

Despite the beating of war drums.....no one wants armed conflict....not the U.S., not China, and most of all, not the members of ASEAN. Too many people and too many economies are at stake.[CN]

尽管战争之鼓已经打响...没人想要军事冲突的...美国不想,中国不想。更重要的是,东盟成员更不想。太多人的经济利益忧戚相关了。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Philip

It's good for the Chinese, including Overseas Chinese to be assertive, esp to Capt 'a' who has no business in the South China Sea![CN]

对中国人来说,是好事,当然也包括海外中国人,尤其对于在中国南海没有生意往来的军官尤是如此。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
gabe

I'm not sure that it is a chess game anymore. To me it looks like the powers that be have grown tired of chess. Now they are setting up the Risk board[CN]

不太确定这还是不是一个象棋游戏。对我来说,更像是超级大国们厌倦了这场象棋游戏。现在他们都开始高举“战争板”。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
OmochironReply togabe

Being older I saw this same scenario back in the 60s and 70s. I was around for the Cuban Missile Crisis. That was a very tense day. I thought it was all over. The cold war ended with President Regan's efforts and Gorbachev on Russia's side. Now due to the weakness of #$%$ America is back in a cold war with Russia and China. Just a matter of time until the cold war goes hot. Almost time to put your head between your legs and kiss your #$%$ goodbye.[CN]

更早在60-70年代,我看过相同的情景。我经历了古巴导弹危机。那天局势真的很紧张。我以为一切都结束了。冷战在美国里根政府和俄国戈尔巴乔夫的努力下结束了。现在又轮到美国和中俄冷战了。冷战升温也不过是时间问题。抱着头缩在两腿间,好好跟...吻别吧。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JayT

Duh! It doesn't take a genius to figure out that Russia will always back China. No matter how the US and Russia get along or not-

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Gilbert MagwoodReply toJayT

agree

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
OmochironReply toJayT

But I thought Putin was odumbo's friend and good buddy. I guess not. No leader in the world respects odumbo.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JesseReply toJayT

Espically when it comes to one free Korea. They will back each other and do anything to prevent that from happening.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
TakedatReply toJayT

Rightfully so I'd say.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
pspox

It looks like Russia is no longer supporting Vietnam.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
HowardReply topspox

Because Vietnam now is running to hug the US.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JdawgReply topspox

Russia just wants to support whoever the US is against. China, Vietnam, the Syrian gov't, it doesn't matter. If Russia could ally with China in a war against US you can be sure they would, because they would see it as beneficial to themselves.

Basically, Russia wants to do whatever they think will further their agenda.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Spencer KReply topspox

I was always told 'money talks'. That's such #$%$: it screams so loudly that it drowns out every other voice

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
avxReply topspox

Russia never did, only the former Soviet Union.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Wayne ZReply topspox

China still supports Vietnam. Many neighbors there have overlaying claims. Aside from the rocks, their communist relationship is ok. Notice I said ok and not great :)

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Richard AReply topspox

@Wayne, Last year Vietnam participated in joint military exercises with the US, and in May of 2014 more than 1,000 Chinese nationals had to flee hostile mobs in Hanoi, who were upset over China placing an oil rig in Vietnamese waters. Relations between Vietnam and People's Republic of China are not good now.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
DonReply topspox

Believe it or not the Vietnamese "love" US! They despised the Russians for being too stingy and the Chinese for greedy.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Alex GReply topspox

The Vietnamese have always loved us. Ho Chi Minh wanted to continue our alliance after WW II, and even based the Vietnamese constitution on the US constitution, but we spit in his face and said "we're coming for you"...

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
DanWReply topspox

That's because Vietnam does not support China.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JesseReply topspox

Well we've pestered and picked at Russia. Humiliating Putin at every turn. You thinks it's a coincidence the Panama Papers had almost no U.S. itizens in it, but nailed Putin? Only slightly embarrassed Cameron.. We are in a Cold War folks... Pretty good timing for oil to plummet don't you think? How's that working out for Russia....

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JoeMusashiReply topspox

@Alex G that's the turning point in history. Imagine if Ho Chi Minh had gained the support from the U.S. president at the time! How will history change?

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GlennReply topspox

@Jesse: "From a Military perspective Israel is worth every dime."

That's what happens when we have a strong President and Russia a weakling Tsar.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
FlynReply topspox

Russia can let the chibks believe its on there side but in a war russia would not help them they trust china less than us and they know if china would win a war china would invade russia next being right at thair back door puten mught be two faced but hes not stupid

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
tommyReply topspox

Vietnam dont have what russian wanted n needed its moneys.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
joeReply topspox

I believe Vietnam would be a great future ally of the U.S. Had the U.S. not caved into France's Charles ( lead your troops into battle hiding in England) DeGaulle Uncle Ho would have never waged war with the U.S. He actually just wanted independence from France for his people.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Chris FReply topspox

I guess China isn't either.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
TimurReply topspox

US loved Vietnam so much it killed 1 million of them. Vietnam love US so much it wanted a repeat.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
TLOReply topspox

@Don, wait until they see the true colors of the U.S., then they will know what's really stingy and greedy.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
TimReply topspox

Russia supports Russia and anyone who wants to band together and help destroy AMERICA, THEY HATE OUR GUTS.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
CoozReply topspox

TLO, go ask the Japanese, the Germans and the Italians regarding your comment. These were enemies of the U.S. And are now the most wealthy amongst nations. Check out. Russia after the war claimed territories for themselves... China knows no real friend. Go ask the North Koreans stupid. Lol

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
jeff

China has reached a consensus with Brunei, Laos and Cambodia... LMAO... Laos is land locked. Cambodia's coast line is in the Bay of Thailand, not South China Sea. And what the hell is Brunei? Isn't it a waterfront county in Malaysia? :-) ... and I believe Malysia also disputes China's claim.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MosesReply tojeff

.....and the U.S. is thousands of miles away......and a million miles off course.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ack ooi

in the 70s, thai waters was full of pirates, rebels, many sailors, fishermen, tourists were kidnapped by those thugs. everybody missed the point. today, many thickos still miss the point. particular those who own those thugs, are happy to embroiled in this miss the point conflicts.

lucky, this is 2016, some are still stupid, many are not, so clear the thugs, don't breed n feed thugs. apart from usa has too many carriers to sail around, n china too busy to send cargoes, these poor fishermen, tourists, users, etc., really need are safe n controlled waters.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Adam

I wondered for a while what Obama was doing just twiddling his thumbs while allowing them to continue building...

This is and will be the excuse he uses to try and stay in power.

Now some of you may call me a "Evangelical crazy", but we shall see in the end.

Heck.... We can't even fly over the Baltic sea without Russia zipping past our ships! Heck it is supposed to be international air space yet these #$%$ can build islands 1000 miles from their borders and claim it theirs?!

Not right folks..

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
AlexReply toAdam

For decades we have been doing the same. The rest of the world has caught up and isn't going to sit back and let the US dictate terms any more. In fact China is poised to overtake us as the new world power. Our navel fleet is just one more thing pushing us to a point where the US dollar becomes worthless because we are too far in debt.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
C JReply toAdam

Half the products in the U.S. are made in China Adam! Your TV, your cell phone, your microwave, and most everything you see right now. I don't like Obama but American C.E.O.s are 100% responsible for moving manufacturing to China and it if you decided to bring all manufacturing back to the U.S. tomorrow it would take 3-4 yrs. to get 50% of it back! China gained strength wile we were busy blowing trillions (money we owe our enemy China by the way and we pay them interest on) in Iraq they were getting stronger!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
C JReply toAdam

China would be a real war and it wouldn't be 1% of our population fighting it by the way! It is estimated it would take more people than we sent to Desert Storm (1&2), World War 1&2, and Vietnam combined! It would take TRILLIONS of dollars we don't have! And you do realize lots of the parts we use in military equipment are made in China (Thanks to greedy American military contractors)!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
C JReply toAdam

You do realize we are in a election process already? Obama was about as bad as woosy Bush!!!!!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
TakedatReply toAdam

America has no business in the Baltics right on Russia's border to start with you moron.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
AdamReply toAdam

You people sound so unamerican it's not funny! Do you even love your country anymore? Would you not try to protect it?

I swear it's turned into nothing but a bunch of whining, crying, handout wanting, check drawing, loafers who only care about themselves!

What the #$%$ is wrong with you people?

Pure gutless cowards who are scared to death to take a stand.

And i actually wondered why other countries get away with what they do!!

Jesus Christ i wish things would come to a head so we could finally have the #$%$ out and end all of this garbage, unamerican, garbage that spew out of peoples mouths like yourselves!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Human RaceReply toAdam

Adam

Volunteer and fight in the frontline yourself and be the cannon fodder for the US MICC (Military Industrial Congressional Complex) ! But just don't talk big !!!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
theodorew

Another war is coming.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
zReply totheodorew

china win

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
D.Reply totheodorew

Another war picked by the warmongers in the US Congress.

Do you see them ordering the US Navy OUT of that area? No.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JesseReply totheodorew

It's possible, however it depends on who is in power when things hest up. We will be wishing we voted Bernie. China and Russia together is no joke, that would not be good for us or the world. I'm sure we could win but does anyone really win I'm war. This would be something we can't even imagine.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ThomasReply totheodorew

D that's because the US isn't a pushover. We have a necessary interest in maintaining free flow of trade through the South China Sea and some second world chode like Xi isn't going to infringe upon our national goals!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MachiReply totheodorew

Wait.........................

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
SergeReply totheodorew

actually if the war starts with china we all know that russia will back them up, we will lose this 1!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ForRealsDudeReply totheodorew

We will not lose, we can take on China and Russia plus we have a lot more nations on our side say the whole NATO. Our Navy a lone is a lot bigger than China's and Russia's put together.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GrizzReply totheodorew

Due to Obama's cowardice

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GeneReply totheodorew

Russia and China do not want a war with the US. Notice that the US govt and military has been provoking them in their regions, like the establishment of NATO military bases on Russia's borders, or saber rattling by the US navy in the South CHINA Sea. They are not building those islands near our Pacific coast, are they? And our govt does not have the moral high ground to tell Chinese what to do near their shores, even given our history with the Philipines, and what the US did there at one point in time, for which I do not remember any apologies.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
stevebReply totheodorew

Chinese and Russian goons are no match for the rest of the planet. Scroo China. scroo Russia. Xi and Putin are both dykhaydsPolands can kick China's #$%$ buttwiper fish-headed goons fed old stale rice and entrails for dinner. Scroo CHINA. Scroo RUSSIA. Now.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
DanReply totheodorew

It s the holy war you should be worrying about. It s not in the South China Sea.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
TONY TReply totheodorew

The USA will never lose this war, RUSSIA and CHINA will be wiped off the planet, you have to understand that the super power (USA) is ready they are just waiting

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
barryReply totheodorew

To Ms. Theodorew: (See # 1, 2, 3,3A,3B, 4)

1)--

The next major wars (((nota: warssss))) will be in 13 - 18 years.

2)--

There will be several theatres of Arab Muslim attacks.

3)--

There will be several civil wars

3A)--

--signs of civil wars have one country sustaining several civil wars and breaking into 3 to 5 countries.

3B)--

--then are signs of changes in Europe (no longer as it is now) - but not sure what will happen - those signs aren't there

4)--

Signs are also of the UN collapsing in a decade or so, because of it following in the last 5 years or so similar steps it's predecessor (League of Nations) did in the 1930's before it collpsed by 1939.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JasonReply totheodorew

z...China cannot win a war without a blue water navy. They know this. This is political theater.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ElliotReply totheodorew

Tronald Dump will be the spark of the war if he gets elected.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
dom bReply totheodorew

@serge the only way we will lose a war is with those un patriotic d bags who stand on our Flag in our country no force outside our borders would stop us

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
AlexReply totheodorew

We will not win a war against China and Russia. It will most likely be a draw where billions will be dead. I don't see either us or them wanting war but I see that they are tired of the US sailing ships to their shores and trying to dictate policy.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MichaelReply totheodorew

It's all about politics people! there will be no war...so get a grip..

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ToyotaReply totheodorew

in time of war nobody wins everyone will be a loser.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Tim

This will lead to war soon. Albert Einstein said, 'WW4 will be fought with sticks and stones'. He is exactly right if anyone is left alive after WW3.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
tommyReply toTim

Ww3 only break out when we ran out out all natural resources on this planet.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
TimReply toTim

Yo tommy, you should really get more educated about the condition of the world and just how broke the US is and the rest of the world. The entire world is at the brink of world war and it is not a joke. Just look at history, we are way past due for the next big one and this will be the worst in the history of the entire planet which is billions of years!!!!!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
TONY TReply toTim

give them 48 hours and wipe those islands out

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
John J CaseyReply toTim

The planet needs relief from the human infestation and war seems the best hope a modern medicine has eliminated most natural cures. Are you trained to survive? Hey,99% lace those boots up and let's put them on the ground one foot in front of the other. If you don't know the direction to travel just head towards all the loud bangs. One problem in the USA is that less than 1% has experienced combat. When I was born that was not the case as veterans were everywhere and most street crime was handled on the spot. Make love, not war? Yeah and the population went from 1 billion to 7 billion. Obviously, like most hippie ideas this one did not work. It was a massive failure.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JReply toTim

WELL, if that's the case, can we PLEASE HURRY UP the fight!!!! At least throwing rocks at each other is less lethal than any other methods.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Eric1

Nations do what they do when they do it because they CAN. Nobody is willing to start WW3 to stop the Chinese, and that's an end to it.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Gungis KhenReply toEric1

You sure about that Eric1?

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
DanWReply toEric1

The next war will be started as a reaction to an event. The remainder of the world will follow.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
RaymondWReply toEric1

There will be Another world war, no doubt about it ask the rothchilds.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Eric1Reply toEric1

Quite certain. It is the fundamental rule of Realpolitik. No, there will never be another world war. That doesn't mean there won't be wars, but a world war (which is a war fought for the purpose of world domination) will not for the very simple reason that no nation or even coalition of nations could win such a war.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Eric1Reply toEric1

World wars do NOT start 'as a reaction to an event.' World wars start from a desire for world hegemony. Since 'world hegemony' is an impossibility, see rule number one.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
barryReply toEric1

To Mr. Eric 1 and Gentlemen: (See Opening Then # 1, 2)

Re: The More major Wars Coming -- in 13 to 18 years

1)--

Two countries are getting ready for self-defense, meaning they see the wars coming.

---Russia and China

2)--

Other countries and organizations are not taking self-protection steps, meaning they do not see the wars coming, and probably will not until it is too late

---Christian Europe, India, US

---UN, EU, NATO

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Eric1Reply toEric1

barry, I suggest you leave geopolitics to people who actually KNOW something about it. YOU, obviously DON'T. Here's a HINT; WHAT is going on in Eastern Europe NOW? NATO is MARSHALLING its forces. Units are moving EAST. The Swedes are rearming, as are the Romanians and ALL of the Baltic nations. The Poles are building new bases on their EASTERN border with Russia, and the garrison bases on their WESTERN border will be soon manned by NATO forces, to include ever-growing numbers of American armored Brigades. At the same time, the US is 're-garrisoning' the Philippines, already HAS a Marine Regiment stationed in Australia, and more are headed to Guam. The US Navy is pressing in on the South China Sea, with carrier task-forces equipped with robotic drone fighter-bombers, and MORE are coming. ALL of these things are designed with but ONE purpose in mind; to press BACK the forces of chaos that are growing, to RESTRICT them in their ambitions, and this is what the TRADE DEALS being negotiated now are ALSO about, the TTP, and TTIP are DESIGNED to strangle BOTH China AND Russia, and that is PRECISELY what they will do. I refer you back to my initial REalpolitik statement; nations do what they do, when they do, because they CAN. That is PRECISELY 'what we are doing' NOW.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
TimReply toEric1

War is fought over 3 things people: MONEY, TERRITORY, REVENGE, that,s it

and the RESOURCES IS THE MONEY!!!!!!!!! which is also GREED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
AlexReply toEric1

NATO? Really? If provoked Russia will let the nukes fly and eastern EU countries like Poland will be the land where the nukes fall as they get shot out of the air. That means all those new NATO bases will be gone. The EU is counting on any war to be a limited one. Meanwhile Russia and China are slowly teaming up. That should scare the hell out of every western country. China has lots of people to fight and a vast manufacturing ability while Russia has world class weapon technology and lots of resources. We won WWII simply because we cut off Germany and Japan's access to supplies like steel and oil.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
AlexandraReply toEric1

Everyone like to jump 3 spaces ahead and go straight to the drama. The countries economies are too inextricably linked. There will be saber rattling and maybe even isolated skirmishes but there won't be a WWIII. I know, I know, it is sure exciting to think about

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Eric1Reply toEric1

Bingo.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Monty

Russia siding with China means nothing. They invaded Ukraine. Its a tit for tat relationship. You support us, we will support you. Russia means nothing when they can't even make support objectively. You might as we say North Korea sides with China in the disputes.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
AlexReply toMonty

idiot. It's a huge deal. Russia has military technology that matches ours. China has manufacturing that has no rival. Russia has vast natural resources. China has lots of money. If the two countries team up they will be more than a match for us. Don't count on Britain to help us out either. They can't afford it and the rest of the EU is gutless wimps. China will get control over the South China Sea while Russia will weaken NATO because of the exponential costs of being the leading force in both.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
James

The U.S. local police uses military hardware in its day to day operations.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
timReply toJames

Yes and the posse comitatus act was supposed to prevent that from happening. That was the very first law that was perverted into oblivion. Even when the law passed it was perverted. The posse comitatus was originally supposed to protect us from Law Enforcement being used as a para military force and revenue chasing entity. Our fore fathers worst nightmares have been recognized. The original origins of the entire of the posse comitatus were supposed to have originated with Harry Truman. How true that is I don't know I've been putting the question out there for years to be answered who initiated the possed comitatus. Some one did ping me and I have the sheet I tucked away. It had some information about the subject.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
BillReply toJames

False---I never see any anywhere/. You have been watching too many TV shows and are ill informed.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Judenrat CharmerReply toJames

Bill, come to New York State, NYPD, Yonkers PD both have APC's, sub machine guns, etc. as does LA PD. Or you can come by my place upstate New York where the local sheriff owns several military spec Hum-Vees and the stats police also have APC's. Even Nypd and you uniforms are military attire and not standard police fare.

Do you live under a rock?

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
KokReply toJames

Well, it is cheaper to use 2nd undated gear than making a new one.

US isn't the only nation doing that.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
steven

There is a big difference between primitive time and modern time.

In modern time people just dont steal, cheat, rape, kill , land grabbing without have to pay for the consequences.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
TaikoReply tosteven

today the U.S is doing them all.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
solarReply tosteven

Are you stupid or just ignorant? why do you think the US and its European allies have been going to war for? Don't tell me it's for freeing people and spreading democracy? Nothing has changed, these white nations have been raping Africa, Middle East and everyelse they can using military might and the media.It is very fustrating dealing with people like you who fail to see these realities. I hope with all my soul that there will be a day of reckoning or a day of justice if such thing really exist in this world.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Richard

Moscow will support Beijing diplomatically, economically, militarily and morally, all the way up until the point where nothing is left of Beijing except radioactive rubble bouncing off of rubble. Then it will pretend to ally with the United States as it invades China. No one will be able to stop the Russians as they seize Manchuria, at a minimum, if not Xinjiang as well. With friends like the Russians, who needs enemies?

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
TakedatReply toRichard

Russia will pretend to ally itself with the U.S.? You mean like America pretended to ally itself with Russia in WWII? Come on now, who's the real #$%$ artist here if not the U.S. itself.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
p

how can any US company do business when you can't use the internet or access your email account because they have been blocking everything. It is a fixed system and a one way street.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
BestReply top

can .alibaba for u.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Hervey

WHAT A WORLD,coming from those who claimed that the Americas belong to America.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
yeung

If war breaks out , the ocean, marine life, the ecosystem, the islands, the beautiful Earth our living planet as the only livable planet in the solar system, is going to be badly damaged, polluted, radioactive ... !

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]

评论

游客 请登录 注册