New cell treatment could help us live a THIRD longer: Life expectancy could leap to 108 with controversial cell rejuvenation technique

细胞回春术引争议：新细胞技术延长生命1/3，可活到108岁
Shivali Best For Mailonline and Colin Fernandez Science Correspondent For The Daily Mail

国外网友评论 0人跟帖 　　 7132人参与

chris8910
Not to worry, it will only be available to the very wealthy.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
John HayReply tochris8910
Not for long. As with all mass medicines, it becomes very cheap because they can make it in bulk.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Jezzie
I'd rather you put the money into saving children and ending suffering. Old age does not need curing, but the medical companies know with the increasing older population it's big business.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
AliceReply toJezzie
Old age does not need curing, you're right, but some of the ailments that come with it I would happily do without. Ten years ago I was fit and healthy; now I am not, and I am only 63.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
chopper
I'm sure the government will see this as an excuse to raise the retirement age!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
MarcusReply tochopper
You think everyone else should pay for your 40 year retirement? And I bet you think its the young that are entitled.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
martinReply tochopper
yes after having paid tax and NI for about 47 years by the time I retire I DO think I am quite adequately entitled to my pension thank you
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
kerriaReply tochopper
And the cheeky b.u.g.g.e.r.s. keep trying to claim the state pension a benefit! it most certainly is not, it was paid for out of wages!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
desertdwllr
Imagine what the UK, and Europe, will be like in 20 years, then ask yourself, "Do I really want to be around for this?" Pensioners are already being abused, and treated with contempt, as it is.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Marty
Great....but only for the super filthy rich. Cannot see for a moment the masses getting this.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
wheres sybil
Would I still have to read Daily Mail articles with that extra third? Let me rethink this....
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
uncle mort
Followed by retirement at 100 years of age.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Rammed Earth
Cancer cells are immortal, folks. These researchers are not fixing anything--they are trying to manipulate the rich, greedy few. and honestly, I don't even believe their findings.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
charlie1Reply toRammed Earth
Only cancer stem cells are immortal. The majority of cancer cells are not! Reading all your post, I think there is a lot of earth rammed between your ears!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Rogue Element
Buy one get third free?
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Toryliar
Could be available(if your wealthy enough) in hundred years time
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Gary
Progeria isn't the same as aging, it just has some similar symptoms. It's good that they've found a treatment, but making a short-lived diseased mouse live longer than another short-lived diseased mouse probably doesn't have much to say about aging in humans.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Witzelsucht
Old people will be trooping up to pay for this rejuvenation if it ever gets out of the mice stage and approved by the FDA. Imagine the billions and billions the developers of this technique will make. It would be bigger than the internet.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
On
Why even bother telling us when it could be 10 years from now that human trials start?
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Gamelan
Can it cure baldness?
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Capt Dan
Another definite maybe for our collection.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Sleeertiger
Do you honestly think this will be available to the man on the Clapham Omnibus.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
charlie1
''Will take ten years''. This is the standard cry to get more grant money!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Queen Tiyi
Medical companies will do everything to make you live longer. Their boss need our money to buy his new properties.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Stokey boy
The thought of Blair & co being around for even longer is not good one. Had enough of him already.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
slf1983
So they can raise the regirement age & really work people into the ground before they die! Yeah, great. Thanks.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]

页面


评论

游客 ☂ 请登录 注册