MailOnline: China launches its first ever self-built aircraft carrier

每日邮报：中国第一艘自主航空母舰下水
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4446206/China-launches-domestically-built-aircraft-carrier-media.html#comments

国外网友评论 0人跟帖 　　 10011人参与

Arthur Fraynberg
"Self Built" with a little help from their globalist banker friends. Click on the video tab on google and search for the video "China and the new world order corbettreport"
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
uk supremeReply toArthur Fraynberg
Self built with stolen Western technology
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
angry from DerbyReply toArthur Fraynberg
Stolen western technology? It is based on a Russian class carrier.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Joker
Britain, Germany Japan 1930sChina,Russia,US ............2020sHere we go again,nothing learnt
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Sy GunsonReply toJoker
Difference this time is after punching a few buttons half of the human race will be dead and in 24 hours it will all be over
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Harry338
It actually looks quite impressive. The problem is it was 'Made in China' and I think we all know what that means. Cheap junk.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
muttontump
Huho, I would.nt jest too much.... Was,nt it Napoleon that said...."let China sleep, for when she awakens the whole world will tremble".
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
electraglideReply tomuttontump
yeah, but "made in China" didn't mean then what it means today.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
nj1
Looks crap....
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
BadSull
Let's get it on already!!!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
BurntReply toBadSull
Grow up
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
muttontumpReply toBadSull
Yep, typical gung ho yank.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
orvos
And who is going to collect all the confetti of the water !!!!!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
sb4100Reply toorvos
No one will. They don't recycle anything.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Reskammel
Someone should tell China that the days of empire building are over.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
TheEnglishman101Reply toReskammel
Dont think so!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
justcuriousReply toReskammel
Tell the USA too please.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
centerlane
Ski jump ramp in this century. I'm sure it would be fine in 1940. They can only launch or land half the number of jets compared to US carrier. Very old school.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
THE OLD MATELOT
Let's hope it lasts' longer than other Chinese-built goods' (I. E. more than a week!!).
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Patrick JReply toTHE OLD MATELOT
Like your iPhone?
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
thomas20111
They don't seem to have too many helicopters something I thought would be needed in large numbers today.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Sy GunsonReply tothomas20111
Liaoning has 45 days endurance @ 32 knots. The Shandong is faster and has more endurance
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
mepal1Reply tothomas20111
Shandong........will be a fully operational combat carrier, just as their first carrier was announced as a fully combat carrier. Of course they do training, but that is not the sole purpose of these vessels, as they are heavily armed, and would be used if needs be in a conflict it one arose.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Cuffs357
Ohh well more warmongering and saber rattling. Little Napoleon just keeps on babbling
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
efuse
Can we get the Premiership over with first before any nuclear war, cheers.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
NewGenerationReply toefuse
What, and have Chelsea as the last ever winners? No chance, Trump is a United supporter!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
efuseReply toefuse
Torquay United F.C. you mean?
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
wellthatsinteresting
You might want to top off your gas tanks, grocieries and such... This could go south fast... It can't hurt..
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Paul Beaumont
****CHINA started COPYING many BRITISH world renowned GOODS early as the 196Os and Trade Union obsessed (demarcation JOB crazy Britain) did little to STOP them.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
calls4u2
Lots of comments here, I'm gonna be different and look at the ship not the country - It looks like a very well designed and built ship, and of course they copied other designs - that's what pushes innovation.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
BunmiO
What's the point of all these aircraft carriers anyway, in high scaled war, they are not invisible and can be sunk by a determined force, then what, does it justify all the cost and lives that would be on board.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
mAKReply toBunmiO
You should apply for a job at every military defence contractor. They should sack all their experts and engineers, and hire you, Mr DM Reader with decades of pub debating experience.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
BunmiOReply toBunmiO
mAK, thanks for your compliments, coming from you, I will apply
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Mind BurnerReply toBunmiO
Nonsence. You have been watching homeland for too long. Very few nations have look down satellite tracking like the US. Carriers move and have layered defenses. Anyone taking a pot shot at a carrier group will feel the wrath of over 500 tomahawk missile raining down If carriers were so rubbish why is everyone trying to build more of them.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Sy GunsonReply toBunmiO
Force projection. With a carrier or two you can park a small air force off a distant nation and impose your will
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
BunmiOReply toBunmiO
The key word is 'high scaled war', and DM, good job in your agenda of what types of responses you are letting through..
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Completely AverageReply toBunmiO
You don't even know what a "high scaled war" is. It's a term you just made up without any real meaning behind it. You think you sound important using it, and that impresses you. ... Here's something for you to think about. In your "high scaled war" did you give any consideration to the fact that a single US aircraft carrier has nearly as many fighter jets as the entire RAF, and more combat aircraft than 85% of the militaries on earth possess? Plus there are a dozen support ships including Aegis equipped destroyers, missile frigates, and attack subs that are dedicated to protecting the carrier? Tell me, in your tiny little mind, just what do you think your "high scaled war" is going to require to get past the more than 1,000 missiles and 75+ fighter jets, plus the ship's own defensive systems and succeed in hitting a US carrier, and just how many countries are capable of it?
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Joe Hunt.
Bufuses underestimating the potential enemy. Did any of you note that China has 2 billion troops?
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
FNFReply toJoe Hunt.
You realize that the population of China is around 1.3 Billion you idiot?
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
fleabittenrangebumReply toJoe Hunt.
Florida, FNF
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
RTW1Reply toJoe Hunt.
With only 1.371 billion population? Wow, they're amazing.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
MariemeeReply toJoe Hunt.
A couple bombs takes care of that.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
ExpatbladePI
Wish America would leave China to deal with N Korea as they are the only one who can do this peacefully and will , bad move by the states putting these systems in Japan and South Korea when China has asked them not too
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
to.astrian
You can get them at 55% reduction in gearbest already
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]

页面


评论

游客 ☂ 请登录 注册