MailOnline: China launches its first ever self-built aircraft carrier

每日邮报：中国第一艘自主航空母舰下水
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4446206/China-launches-domestically-built-aircraft-carrier-media.html#comments

国外网友评论 0人跟帖 　　 10016人参与

Spiny Norman
The flags and streamers give it a festive air.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
tommie12311
let them build as much as they see fit.... its just more targets to take out on the battle field ....
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
UlyaReply totommie12311
Thank you for your comment, China can build about 20-25 of these for the price of 1 US carrier, they can afford to lose a few and not care, if the US lost a single carrier the world would never hear the end of your complaining and we would be subjected to a movie of US heroism.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
shank3r
That's not a new design. Maybe a new ship, but that's a 60 year old designed deck. I guess they couldn't figure out how to make the cable launch/catch system work.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
GC
its like a show of who has the biggest manhood, yet none of them do, so they have to use military...
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
HondoXP
nice boat.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
tdog7600
Didn't Trump say that China will help with North Korea? Wrong again. China is not amassing troops on the NK/China border to stop refugees, those troops are reinforcements.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Vincent BoucherReply totdog7600
And you get Intel briefs!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
justcurious
Why are we wasting billions on 2 carriers, what difference will that make to peace,?Is there nothing else in this country which needs the money?
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
bolterReply tojustcurious
We will probably sell one to the Opposition sometime soon.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Softshoe
Stop playing war games trumpet. We are not impressed.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
MrjoshuaReply toSoftshoe
Childish posts are getting boring......................
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Paul Beaumont
.....and NOT an ounce of ***STEEL or IRON etc from BRITAIN. ALL **Manufactured and produced in PRC GOODS world swamping CHINA.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Brenthawkinsmd
That little carrier may be equipped with weapon escalators.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
loreng
And why didn't they tell NK to stop their 'drills'?
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
StonedNotStupid
Ewww, Bob Hope with a stringy mustache. Those things always look so comical, like one you'd order out of the Acme catalog, not a real aircraft carrier. Pretty sure if you want to be taken seriously, you shouldn't need a ski-jump to launch your intrepid eagles into the sky. Show some class and self-respect, sheesh. )
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Ralpha1961
I believe the liberal democrats gave the once peasant Chinese, American technology as trade for cash to line their pockets.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
HPD2277
Carriers are okay for proxy wars and small conflicts, but if there is ever another global war they will go the way of the battleship in WW2. Missiles negate the carrier in a world war. This happens in every major war....out with the old and in with the new.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Brother IsaacReply toHPD2277
During the Middle East conflicts, we shot our wad of missiles in a matter of months and rushed to open facilities to make more. What would happen if there were a counter attack that would require more? Should we go nuclear at that point? If it were an established enemy like Russia and China that would immediately sink our carriers and then deal with the secondary missile threat, would we go nuclear then too? Any global conflict would not really last long because the risk is so great, the respective players would throw all in. This sort of posturing drives us to that point. It's not good and to think otherwise the U.S. can continue its hegemony and hubris over others will not be tolerated for long will quickly come to an end. And so will us.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
BillyBasherReply toHPD2277
That's why carriers are surrounded by Aegis class Cruisers and Destroyers who can track and launch anti-aircraft missiles at over 100 targets at a time. Believe me when I say they are the most protected ship the world has ever known. Ship Captains are even trained to sacrifice their own ship by maneuvering between any anti-ship missile that gets through and the carrier.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
PioneerReply toHPD2277
You're clearly not a strategist or a general, lol. The world has come a long way since World War II, and most carriers are protected by battle groups as well as aircraft. It would not be so simple as it was in World War II. Also, in a large war, an Aircraft carrier would not be sent to the front lines.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Meh...
Meh.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Lancelot Jones
all these sexy carriers, they are the flagships of the 21st century! you aren't a country till you get a aircraft carrier!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Mike
20% of the world's population, best stay friends with them. That's some army on tap.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Edward Toner
I think we're lucky they only 2. If they wanted to they easily build a bigger navy than america, and quickly.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
B. K. SargentReply toEdward Toner
They've been building it for years but the USA has been building for a lot longer and continues to build at a fast rate, China would have to bankrupt itself to overtake the USA.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
to.astrian
well as soon as they put aircraft on it it'll be instantly better than ours
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Ken Bok
Good lookin ship if I may say so and being conventional powered ,less risk of radiation leakage and poisoning should it be hit by a torpedo
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Raptor75Reply toKen Bok
Also slow with much less capacity, range and endurance while drastically increasing logistical support needs.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]

页面


评论

游客 ☂ 请登录 注册