The Indian/Chinese IQ puzzle
INDIAN TRIBES MIGRATED OUT OF INDIA IN SEVERAL WAVES, EAST AND WEST OF INDIA, INTO CENTRAL ASIA AND EUROPE AND INTO TIBET AND CHINA ITSELF. INDIAN GENOME IS THE MOST DIVERSE IN THE WORLD, SECOND TO AFRICANS, THE DEPTH OF DIVERSITY IN THE INDIAN RACE MEANS IT IS FAR OLDER THAN BOTH THE EAST ASIAN/CHINESE AND CENTRAL ASIANS/EUROPEANS. INDIAN CIVILIZATION SPREAD EAST AND WEST OF INDIA. AND NOW AFTER 500YEARS OF WAR AND OCCUPATION OF INDIA BY EUROPEAN AND ARABS, THE TRUTH IS COMING OUT! THESE SO CALLED I.Q TEST ARE WHOLLY FLAWED. INDIAN HAVE BEEN OPPRESSED FOR OVER 500YEARS AND THESE TEST ARE NO INDICATION OF THE WEALTH OF INDIANS, INTELLECTUALLY AND MATERIALISTICALLY. CHINA IS A DICTATORSHIP AND THEREFORE HAVE CENTRALIZED AND CLOSED ITSELF FROM THE OUTSIDE WORLD UNTIL NOW, INDIAN POLITICS AND COLONIAL INTERFERENCE STILL LINGERS IN INDIA WHICH HAS FALTERED AND HALTED THE PROGRESSION OF INDIA, BUT INDIA WILL RISE AND ITS INEVITABLE. AND INDIANS ARE ONE RACE, ONE GENOME, CASTE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RELIGON OTHER THAN A SOCIAL OCCUPATIONAL STRUCTURE DEVELOPED OVER 10,OOOYEARS, PREDATING ANY RELIGON. ARYAN INVASION HAS BEEN COMPLETELY REFUTED. IT WAS AN INDIAN MIGRATION INTO EUROPE.
‘’ M17 is not only more diverse in South Asia than in Central Asia, but diversity characterizes its presence in isolated tribal groups in the south, thus undermining any theory of M17 as a marker of a ‘male Aryan invasion’ of India. One average estimate for the origin of this line in India is as much as 51,000 years. All this suggests that M17 could have found his way initially from India through Kashmir, then via Central Asia and Russia, before finally coming into Europe.”
-Stephen Oppenheimer
_____________________________________________________________________________
Researchers in England have finally settled the centuries-old debate over who gets credit for the creation of calculus.
For years, English scientist Isaac Newton and German philosopher Gottfried Leibniz both claimed credit for inventing the mathematical system sometime around the end of the seventeenth century.
Now, a team from the universities of Manchester and Exeter says it knows where the true credit lies — and it’s with someone else completely.
The “Kerala school,” a little-known group of scholars and mathematicians in fourteenth century India, identified the “infinite series” — one of the basic components of calculus — around 1350.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Baudhāyana who discovered the Pythagoras theorem, several hundred years before any Greek. Baudhāyana listed Pythagoras theorem in his book called Baudhāyana Śulbasûtra (800 BCE). Incidentally, Baudhāyana Śulbasûtra is also one of the oldest books on advanced Mathematics. The actual shloka (verse) in Baudhāyana Śulbasûtra that describes Pythagoras theorem is given below -
dīrghasyākṣaṇayā rajjuH pārśvamānī, tiryaDaM mānī, cha yatpṛthagbhUte kurutastadubhayāṅ karoti.
____________________________________________________________________________________
EAST ASIAN RACE HAS ITS ROOTS IN THE INDIAN AUSTRO-ASIATIC TRIBES OF INDIA.
Researchers found that the Indian populations had more genetic diversity than Europeans and East Asians, which gives a good indicator of the age of a population” Genographic project IBM 2011.
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/7/47/figure/F1?highres=y
To sum up we conclude that, because of its very high frequency and diversity, haplogroup O-M95 had an in-situ origin among the Indian Austro-Asiatics, particularly among the Mundaris, not in Southeast Asia as envisaged earlier.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
A recent study of DNA of Zebu by Chen (2009) has shown that Bos indicus or Zebu had beendomesticated only in India, and not at any other place, ruling out all skepticism in thematter, and proving that it was only after full domestication in India, that Zebu migrated toother parts of the world.Zebu cows have a prominent presence in China and Africa.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
The study analysed 500,000 genetic markers across the genomes of 132 individuals from 25 diverse groups from 13 states. All the individuals were from six-language families and traditionally upper and lower castes and tribal groups.
“The genetics proves that castes grew directly out of tribe-like organizations during the formation of the Indian society.”
“Impossible to distinguish between castes and tribes since their genetics proved they were not different.”
-”Reconstructing Indian Population History”
- David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price & Lalji Singh
- 2009
____________________
In Vizagapatam, Brahmins and Vaishyas together accounted for 47% of the students, Shudras comprised 21% and the other castes (scheduled) were 20%; the remaining 12% were Muslims. In Tinnevelly, Brahmins were 21.8% of the total number of students, Shudras were 31.2% and other castes 38.4% (by no means a low figure). In South Arcot, Shudras and other castes together comprised more than 84% of the students!
In the realm of higher education as well, there were regional variations. Brahmins appear to have dominated in the Andhra and Tamil Nadu regions, but in the Malabar area, theology and law were Brahmin preserves, but astronomy and medicine were dominated by Shudras and other castes. Thus, of a total of 808 students in astronomy, only 78 were Brahmins, while 195 were Shudras and 510 belonged to the other castes (scheduled). In medicine, out of a total of 194 students, only 31 were Brahmins, 59 were Shudras and 100 belonged to the other castes. Even subjects like metaphysics and ethics that we generally associate with Brahmin supremacy, were dominated by the other castes (62) as opposed to merely 56 Brahmin students. It bears mentioning that this higher education was in the form of private tuition (or education at home), and to that extent also reflects the near equal economic power of the concerned groups.
As a concerned reader informed me, the ‘Survey of Indigenous Education in the Province of Bombay (1820-1830)’ showed that Brahmins were only 30% of the total students there. What is more, when William Adam surveyed Bengal and Bihar, he found that Brahmins and Kayasthas together comprised less than 40% of the total students, and that forty castes like Tanti, Teli, Napit, Sadgop, Tamli etc. were well represented in the student body. The Adam report mentions that in Burdwan district, while native schools had 674 students from the lowest thirty castes, the 13 missionary schools in the district together had only 86 students from those castes. Coming to teachers, Kayasthas triumphed with about 50% of the jobs and there were only six Chandal teachers; but Rajputs, Kshatriyas and Chattris (Khatris) together had only five teachers.
____________________________________________________
India had the world’s largest economy from the first to eleventh century, and in the eighteenth century, with a (32.9%) share of world GDP in the first century to (28.9%) in 1000 AD, from the eleventh century to the 1600 the Islamic Invasion of India took place, by 1700 AD with (24.4%).- A Study of Groninen University, reveals that India’s share of the world income went from 24.4% in 1700, to a low of 3.8% in 1952, at the end of the British Empire
>>>>>THIS IS WHY INDIA IS CURRENTLY POOR, THE CHRISTIANS AND THE MUSLIMS LOOTED INDIA INTO POVERTY WHILE ENRICHING THEMSELVES. CHINA DID NOT WITNESS THE DEEP PENETRATION INTO CHINA AS INDIA WITNESSED, MUCH WEALTH, KNOWLEDGE WAS LOST, DESTROYED AND HIDDEN, ONLY NOW ARE WE KNOWING THE TRUTH.
>>>>>INDIAN TRIBES MIGRATED OUT OF INDIA, WEST AND EAST, INTO CENTRAL ASIA, NORTH AFRICA, AND EUROPE, AND EASTWARDS TOWARDS INDO-CHINA.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Sahoo et al had actually written the following words:“The perennial concept of people, language, and agriculture arriving to India together through thenorthwest corridor does not hold up to close scrutiny.Recent claims for a linkage of haplogroups J2, L, R1a,and R2 with a contemporaneous origin for the majority of the Indian castes’ paternal lineages from outside the subcontinent are REJECTED, although our findings do support a local origin of haplogroups F* and H.” .They also rule out arrivals from Southwest Asia because West Asian haplogroups (like Y-Hg G) are not found in India.
_________
Kivisild’s findings (2003) too had shown that humans could not have arrived from West Asia into Indiabecause of lack of West Asian Y-hgs E, G, I, J* and J2f. Kivisild et al wrote,“When compared with European and Middle Eastern populations (Semino et al. 2000), Indians (i) share with themclades J2 and M173 derived sister groups R1b and R1a, the latter of which is particularly frequent in India; and (ii) lack or show amarginal frequency of clades E, G, I, J*, and J2f.”
_________
There is a fundamental unity of mtDNA lineages in India, in spite of the extensive cultural and linguistic diversity, pointing to a relatively small founding group of females in India. Most of the mtDNA diversity observed in Indian populations is between individuals within populations; there is no significant structuring of haplotype diversity by socio-religious affiliation, geographical location of habitat or linguistic affiliation.- Scientists Susanta Roychoudhury and thirteen others studying 644 samples of mtDNA from ten Indian ethnic groups.
_________
Dravidian” authorship of the Indus-Sarasvati civilization rejected indirectly, since it noted, “Our data are also more consistent with a peninsular origin of Dravidian speakers than a source with proximity to the Indus….” They found, in conclusion, “overwhelming support for an Indian origin of Dravidian speakers.”The frequencies of R2 seems to mirror the frequencies of R1a (i.e. both lineages are strong and weak in the same social and linguistic subgroups). This may indicate that both R1a and R2 moved into India at roughly the same time. R2 is very rare in Europe.Sanghamitra Sengupta, L. Cavalli-Sforza, Partha P. Majuder, and P. A. Underhill. – 2006.
_________
A (2009) study headed by geneticist Swarkar Sharma, collated information for 2809 Indians (681 Brahmins, and 2128 tribals and schedule castes). The results showed “no consistent pattern of the exclusive presence and distribution of Y-haplogroups to distinguish the higher-most caste, Brahmins, from the lower-most ones, schedule castes and tribals”. Brahmins from West Bengal showed the highest frequency (72.22%) of Y-haplogroups R1a1* hinting that it may have been a founder lineage for this caste group. The authors found it significant that the Saharia tribe of Madhya Pradesh had not only 28.07% R1a1, but also 22.8% R1a*, out of 57 people, with such a high percentage of R1a* never having been found before. Based on STR variance the estimated age of R1a* in India was 18,478 years, and for R1a1 it was 13,768 years.In its conclusions the study proposed “the autochthonous origin and tribal links of Indian Brahmins” as well as “the origin of R1a1* … in the Indian subcontinent”.S. Sharma, argued for an Indian origin of R1a1 lineage among Brahmins, by pointing out the highest incidence of R1a*, ancestral clade to R1a1, among Kashmiri Pandits (Brahmins) and Saharias, an Indian tribe.
- Sharma et al 2009
_________
Human Genetics at the University of Michigan, conducted genetic analysis of Indian-born individuals in the US. Their studies of 1,200.’We were struck both by the low level of diversity amongst people spanning such a large geographical region, and by the fact that people of the Indian sub-continent constituted a distinct group when compared to populations from other parts of the world,’ said Pragna I. Patel.
_________
Moreover, there are other DNA lineages found in good numbers in West Asia like R1*, R1b3,J*, J2f, I, G and E which are in total more than 53% population of west Asia. These arevirtually absent from India (Sahoo). Had people migrated from West Asia to India,these haplogroups would also have arrived into India. This evidence proves that J2 did notarrive from West Asia, because no lineage can ever migrate without other lineages alsomigrating along with it from the place of origin or expansion. On the other hand nearly all of the Indian male lineages like F*, L1, H (M-69), K2, C5, C*, R1a (M-17) etc. are found inWest Asia, proving a definite Indian migration to West Asia. The HIV protective gene, whichis found in West Asia, and Central Asia too, is absent from India (Majumder and Dey, 2001).Thus on no account, any migration from West Asia to India can be supported.
_________
Sengupta (2006) showed that J2 is well distributed in Indian population.Sengupta et al (2006) found that the haplogroup J2 had a quite high variance, and hence deep time-depthin Indian tribes and castes too. Moreover the frequency is higher in the Dravidian speakingsouth Indians (19%) than the Indo-European speaking north Indians (11%). This destroys theAryan migration into India from West Asia hypothesis of Bellwood (2003 and 2005). The inference what we can derive from Sengupta and colleagues study’s data is that J2 haplogroup originated in India during Last Glacial Maximum, and migrated out of India whenclimate permitted. J2 is 18.7% in south Pakistan, the central place of Indus civilization.Lineage J2 and its derivatives are 23% in Iran and 22.2% in Turkey. (Regueiro et al.2006).But their variances are less than in India. Semino (2004) gives 18,000 ybp as the time of origin of J2. The variance was also high indicating indigenous origin of the haplogroup in India.J2 as well as its sub-clade J2b2 show a decreasing variance from India to the Balkans.
_________
Sahoo et al had actually written the following words:“The perennial concept of people, language, and agriculture arriving to India together through thenorthwest corridor does not hold up to close scrutiny.Recent claims for a linkage of haplogroups J2, L, R1a,and R2 with a contemporaneous origin for the majority of the Indian castes’ paternal lineages from outside the subcontinent are REJECTED, although our findings do support a local origin of haplogroups F* and H.” .They also rule out arrivals from Southwest Asia because West Asian haplogroups (like Y-Hg G) are not found in India.
Kivisild’s findings (2003) too had shown that humans could not have arrived from West Asia into Indiabecause of lack of West Asian Y-hgs E, G, I, J* and J2f. Kivisild et al wrote,“When compared with European and Middle Eastern populations (Semino et al. 2000), Indians (i) share with themclades J2 and M173 derived sister groups R1b and R1a, the latter of which is particularly frequent in India; and (ii) lack or show amarginal frequency of clades E, G, I, J*, and J2f.”
_________
There is a fundamental unity of mtDNA lineages in India, in spite of the extensive cultural and linguistic diversity, pointing to a relatively small founding group of females in India. Most of the mtDNA diversity observed in Indian populations is between individuals within populations; there is no significant structuring of haplotype diversity by socio-religious affiliation, geographical location of habitat or linguistic affiliation.- Scientists Susanta Roychoudhury and thirteen others studying 644 samples of mtDNA from ten Indian ethnic groups.
_________
Dravidian” authorship of the Indus-Sarasvati civilization rejected indirectly, since it noted, “Our data are also more consistent with a peninsular origin of Dravidian speakers than a source with proximity to the Indus….” They found, in conclusion, “overwhelming support for an Indian origin of Dravidian speakers.”The frequencies of R2 seems to mirror the frequencies of R1a (i.e. both lineages are strong and weak in the same social and linguistic subgroups). This may indicate that both R1a and R2 moved into India at roughly the same time. R2 is very rare in Europe.
_________
Sanghamitra Sengupta, L. Cavalli-Sforza, Partha P. Majumder, and P. A. Underhill. – 2006.
A (2009) study headed by geneticist Swarkar Sharma, collated information for 2809 Indians (681 Brahmins, and 2128 tribals and schedule castes). The results showed “no consistent pattern of the exclusive presence and distribution of Y-haplogroups to distinguish the higher-most caste, Brahmins, from the lower-most ones, schedule castes and tribals”. Brahmins from West Bengal showed the highest frequency (72.22%) of Y-haplogroups R1a1* hinting that it may have been a founder lineage for this caste group. The authors found it significant that the Saharia tribe of Madhya Pradesh had not only 28.07% R1a1, but also 22.8% R1a*, out of 57 people, with such a high percentage of R1a* never having been found before. Based on STR variance the estimated age of R1a* in India was 18,478 years, and for R1a1 it was 13,768 years.In its conclusions the study proposed “the autochthonous origin and tribal links of Indian Brahmins” as well as “the origin of R1a1* … in the Indian subcontinent”.
_________
S. Sharma, argued for an Indian origin of R1a1 lineage among Brahmins, by pointing out the highest incidence of R1a*, ancestral clade to R1a1, among Kashmiri Pandits (Brahmins) and Saharias, an Indian tribe.
- Sharma et al 2009
_________
The study analysed 500,000 genetic markers across the genomes of 132 individuals from 25 diverse groups from 13 states. All the individuals were from six-language families and traditionally upper and lower castes and tribal groups. “The genetics proves that castes grew directly out of tribe-like organizations during the formation of the Indian society.”
“Impossible to distinguish between castes and tribes since their genetics proved they were not systematically different.”
-”Reconstructing Indian Population History”
- David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price & Lalji Singh
- 2009
_________
Underhill and colleagues (2009) presented a detailed study of R1a lineages.They found that R1a is oldest in India. This lineage started expanding from Gujarat about 16,000years back. By 14,000 years back or earlier, it reached the Ganga Valley and Indus Valley.Then people carrying R1a genes migrated out of India, through Afghanistan and Tajikistan,reaching Central Asia. From Central Asia they entered East Europe. They inhabited thePontic-Caspian area. Then they populated those areas which are inhabited today by Slavic and Baltic speaking people
_________
Team working on the same topic included Sengupta, King, Cavalli-Sforza, Underhilland colleagues. They showed that R (especially R1a1 and R2) diversity in India is indigenousin origin and does not support hypothesis of immigration from Central Asia or anywhere outside. R1a prevalence is not only high in Indo-European speaking Punjab, south Pakistan and Ganga Valley, but also in Chenchu and Koya tribes of south India (Kivisildet al.200
_________
Oppenheimer (2003) also had supported Indian origin of R1a which is also called M17 in
genetic circles. He wrote, “And sure enough we find highest rates and greatest diversity of the M17 line in north India, and eastern Iran, and low rates in the Caucasus. M17 isnot only more diverse in South Asia than in Central Asia but diversity characterizes it spresence in isolated tribal groups in the south, thus undermining any theory of M17 as a marker of a ‘male Aryan Invasion of India.’ Study of the geographical distribution and thediversity of genetic branches and stems again suggests that Ruslan, along with his son M17,arose early in South Asia, India”.
_________
Observer, I came to see if you made any further posts. I am disappointed.
First of all, I don’t think Bliss is Pakistani. My first guess will be that he is an Australian. It’s also possible that he is black or a woman or a chinese . But I can’t know anything for sure.
I blame them only partially for their racism. They know too little about us. They search up google and make up random ideas about us. There are a bunch of north Indians who are indisciplined like hippies and when they migrate they can get on many low-tolerance white people’s nerves . However, these people do not represent India as a whole. They don’t even represent north-India. Moreover, if you could really get to know these people , you will find that they often have a good heart.
I am, however, deeply saddened by your racist remarks. You seem to have this firm conviction that it’s all about races and superficial features. You are wrong, my friend. People are victim of circumstances in more ways than you can imagine and every group has both kind and murderous people.
And don’t insult the Tamils. Many of them are highly intelligent and a lot of them are fairly good looking. For example, look at Vidya Balan. Does she look ugly to you? I mistook her for a sure-shot Bengali as she looked a bit like one of my former teachers.
Anyway, I was hoping that you will be a little different. That is the reason why I commented here. But you sound just like many other arrogant people here. You even sound like someone who is just trying to impress the whites.
Since I can’t change your mind, this will probably be my last post.
MERRY CHRISTMAS and HAPPY NEW YEAR.
two(infact 3) religions brought the IQ value of Indians low.
1)Hindu religion of north India and South India.
It believes a set of customs and “way of living” which is inferior and keeps humanity the way it was 5000 years ago.
eg: caste system, incest/inter breeding direct or indirectly.
2) Pagan religions of the various tribes of India and the related regions which are absorbed to Hinduism.
These are also beliefs which is negative to a better IQ reading.
3) Hinduism’s offshoot cult called Islam. which is dominating middle east and world over which is far more inferior than the mother religion Hinduism.
These are the reasons why India is lacking in IQ and development.
eg: states like Kerala,Goa and Bigger Metros are having good average IQ and also reflects in the development of these regions. while the Hindu-muslim north India and parts of South India lags long with less than africa living conditions and IQ.
Solution is something which Indians will not be like to accept.
1) A system destroying the inferior systems as cited above.
It can be even Atheism which will Help
2) Catholic/Christianity which is making a change. in southern states like Andhra Pradesh, protestent cults and catholics have converted a lot of people. whether it is “right” or “wrong”, these same Indians once freed from caste system or at least marginally saved from hindu religion are open to education and their lifestyle and HDI are good.
The religion of Hinduism is one reason India is such a poor performer. this, ofcourse will not be taken as a offence by Hindu/muslims. I have nothing particular against religions. but a careful study of how these religions which are almost similar to tribal culture can show you why India is not progressing the way it should.
TC,
IC
Both desert religions have spoiled this country. Hindus are basically peace loving peoples much like Japanese Buddhists and Chinese Confucianists and post-enlightenment European thinkers. Because of christian/muslim appeasement policy and the corruption of the government we are in the suffering end.
No other province could manage a growth rate of 11 per cent like Hindu/BJP controlled Gujarat.
The Indians invented Zero.I mean the great concept of nothing. “Zero” is a great mathematical discovery and the credit belongs to Indian thinkers.
See Dr CK Raju’s work on how/why the differential calculus invented by the [Hindu] kerala school of mathematics and astronomy of the 1400-1500 CE timeframe was imported into europe.
yet another major invention for which the credit has gone undeservedly to europeans.
“In contrast with China,” said Delhi University’s Mohanty, “India’s developmental strategy did not ensure that the land belonged to the tiller, so absentee-landlordism, sharecropping and concealed
landlordism are still the norm in most areas.”
India’s two most populous states—Uttar Pradesh and Bihar—are still plagued by a near-feudal system of absentee landlords and tenant farming.
“I know it is heretical,” said Nick Bridge, a New Zealand diplomat who served in Beijing and until recently was ambassador to India, “but I think one of the main reasons that China has an advantage is that it underwent a violent revolution. The Communists killed the landlords. India still has them, and they are dragging the country down.”
China, like the Soviet Union, launched a mostly disastrous program of collective farming that reached a low in the 1958-61 Great Leap
Forward. In that program, instituted by Mao as an accelerated way to communism, peasants were forced to join production brigades and eat in communal kitchens.
The result was a breakdown in the food production system and the famine that experts now believe killed up to 30 million. The communal kitchens were abandoned in 1962. The collective farms lingered until 1979, when Deng initiated a “household contract system” that lets peasants till their own land and sell their harvests on the open market.
But the essential reforms—land redistribution—that occurred at the time of the revolution remained intact. Once freed from the collective, Chinese farmers prospered—quickly. Some centralized, communal aspects of the system remain and help Chinese peasants organize and coordinate efforts.
“China has made progress in areas where we have not,” M. S. Swaminathan, a renowned agronomist and an architect of India’s “green revolution” in agriculture, said in an interview at the Madras-based Swaminathan Research Foundation. “Because of the very possibility of social mobilization under a single political party, they have been able to get better control of water and pest management.
“The Chinese,” he said, “have an integrated approach to job creation between the farm and off-farm employment which we have not had in this country. The result in India has been the proliferation of urban slums as landless poor people migrate to the big cities of Bombay and
Calcutta and Madras, living in utter squalor and deprivation.”
China’s population increase and agricultural modernization have also produced surplus labor. An estimated 80 million to 100 million people—the “floating population”—are internal migrants, manual laborers, construction workers and curbside vendors in the major cities. But several studies report that an additional 100 million of these people were absorbed by outlying “township enterprises” that India has never developed.
“The main reason that, economically speaking, China is doing so much better than India,” Mohanty said, “is the difference in the political systems that resulted from the kinds of revolutions the two countries went through. I think the Chinese were forced to face the challenge right from the beginning. From 1949 onward, they had to justify their revolution by providing some basic economic needs, partly because they were constantly under attack from the West.
“In India, we also had great values. But at the end of the freedom struggle, there were great compromises. . . . The basic needs of the people got postponed for the vast majority of people.”
In fits and starts in the past five years, India has begun to
institute market liberalization and reforms that China began in the 1980s.
Now, many foreign business analysts are optimistic about India’s potential. “We basically advised our clients that they need to be [investing] in both China and India,” said Dominique Turcq, an analyst with McKinsey & Co. who directed a huge 1995 study comparing the “two giants of the 21st century.”
That study, the most exhaustive economic comparison of the two markets from an investment perspective, predicts that, “in the next decade, both India and China will see sustainable growth.”
Democracy Inhibits Growth
India’s vibrant democracy, Turcq said in an interview in Paris, where he is now based, in some ways inhibits the government’s ability to spur growth. A democratic government, for example, must pay closer attention to inflation and respond to “strong, established lobbies.”
But foreign investors who have worked in both places often find India’s civil society easier to understand and more dependable.
“Democracy puts limits on what you can do in brutalizing the economy,” Turcq said. “But it does give you more stability. India will probably never grow at 12% a year like China. But it will have stability.”
Other observers are not so sure. What the strictly business analyses of India fail to take into account, they say, are growing divisions among castes, religions and economic classes—the haves and the have- nots.
China’s ability to convert quickly to a market economy can be
attributed in part to the country’s attention to the most basic social needs. So while Mao’s party may have been seeking to reach a perfect Communist state—by instituting universal education and public health care and improving the status of women—it also laid the groundwork for a market economy.
“The force of China’s market economy rests on the solid foundations of social changes that occurred earlier,” said economist Sen. “India cannot simply jump onto that bandwagon without paying attention to the enabling social changes—in education, health care and land reforms—that made the market function in the way it has in China.”
Meanwhile, a working measure of success for the two titans may lie in the question posed by former U.S. diplomat Jay Taylor in his 1987 book, “The Dragon and the Wild Goose,” which compares the nations: “Would you rather be the poorest man in China or in India?”
Rone Tempest, The Times’ Beijing Bureau chief since 1993 and New Delhi Bureau chief from 1984 to 1988, reported these stories in India and China.
“As can be seen from these events, to Christianity the Dark Ages never
come to an end”
Events that solely occurred on command of church authorities or were committed in the name of Christianity. (List incomplete)
Ancient Pagans
*As soon as Christianity was legal (315), more and more pagan temples
were destroyed by Christian mob. Pagan priests were killed.
*Between 315 and 6th century thousands of pagan believers were slain.
*Examples of destroyed Temples the Sanctuary of Aesculap in Aegaea,
the Temple of Aphrodite in Golgatha, Aphaka in Lebanon, the
Heliopolis.
*Christian priests such as Mark of Arethusa or Cyrill of Heliopolis
were famous as “temple destroyer.” [DA468] *Pagan services became
punishable by death in 356. [DA468]
*Christian Emperor Theodosius (408-450) even had children executed,
because they had been playing with remains of pagan statues. [DA469]
According to Christian chroniclers he “followed meticulously all
Christian teachings…”
*In 6th century pagans were declared void of all rights.
*In the early fourth century the philosopher Sopatros was executed on
demand of Christian authorities. [DA466]
*The world famous female philosopher Hypatia of Alexandria was torn to
pieces with glass fragments by a hysterical Christian mob led by a
Christian minister named Peter, in a church, in 415.
Mission
*Emperor Karl (Charlemagne) in 782 had 4500 Saxons, unwilling to
convert to Christianity, beheaded. [DO30]
*Peasants of Steding (Germany) unwilling to pay suffocating church
taxes between 5,000 and 11,000 men, women and children slain
5/27/1234 near Altenesch/Germany. [WW223]
*Battle of Belgrad 1456 80,000 Turks slaughtered. [DO235]
*15th century Poland 1019 churches and 17987 villages plundered by
Knights of the Order. Victims unknown. [DO30]
*16th and 17th century Ireland. English troops “pacified and
civilized” Ireland, where only Gaelic “wild Irish”, “unreasonable
beasts lived without any knowledge of God or good manners, in common
of their goods, cattle, women, children and every other thing.” One of
the more successful soldiers, a certain Humphrey Gilbert, half-brother
of Sir Walter Raleigh, ordered that “the heddes of all those (of what
sort soever thei were) which were killed in the daie, should be cutte
off from their bodies… and should bee laied on the ground by eche
side of the waie”, which effort to civilize the Irish indeed caused
“greate terrour to the people when thei sawe the heddes of their dedde
fathers, brothers, children, kinsfolke, and freinds on the grounde”.
Tens of thousands of Gaelic Irish fell victim to the carnage. [SH99,
225]
Crusades (1095-1291)
*First Crusade 1095 on command of pope Urban II. [WW11-41]
*Semlin/Hungary 6/24/96 thousands slain. Wieselburg/Hungary 6/12/96
thousands. [WW23] *9/9/96-9/26/96 Nikaia, Xerigordon (then turkish),
thousands respectively. [WW25-27]
*Until Jan 1098 a total of 40 capital cities and 200 castles conquered
(number of slain unknown) [WW30]
*After 6/3/98 Antiochia (then turkish) conquered, between 10,000 and
60,000 slain. 6/28/98 100,000 Turks (incl. women & children) killed.
[WW32-35]
Here the Christians “did no other harm to the women found in [the
enemy’s] tents - save that they ran their lances through their
bellies,” according to Christian chronicler Fulcher of Chartres.
[EC60]
*Marra (Maraat an-numan) 12/11/98 thousands killed. Because of the
subsequent famine “the already stinking corpses of the enemies were
eaten by the Christians” said chronicler Albert Aquensis. [WW36]
*Jerusalem conquered 7/15/1099 more than 60,000 victims (jewish,
muslim, men, women, children). [WW37-40]
(In the words of one witness “there [in front of Solomon’s temple]
was such a carnage that our people were wading ankle-deep in the blood
of our foes”, and after that “happily and crying for joy our people
marched to our Saviour’s tomb, to honour it and to pay off our debt of
gratitude”)
*The Archbishop of Tyre, eye-witness, wrote “It was impossible to
look upon the vast numbers of the slain without horror; everywhere lay
fragments of human bodies, and the very ground was covered with the
blood of the slain. It was not alone the spectacle of headless bodies
and mutilated limbs strewn in all directions that roused the horror of
all who looked upon them. Still more dreadful was it to gaze upon the
victors themselves, dripping with blood from head to foot, an ominous
sight which brought terror to all who met them. It is reported that
within the Temple enclosure alone about ten thousand infidels
perished.” [TG79]
*Christian chronicler Eckehard of Aura noted that “even the following
summer in all of palestine the air was polluted by the stench of
decomposition”. One million victims of the first crusade alone. [WW41]
*Battle of Askalon, 8/12/1099. 200,000 heathens slaughtered “in the
name of Our Lord Jesus Christ”. [WW45]
*Fourth crusade 4/12/1204 Constantinople sacked, number of victims
unknown, numerous thousands, many of them Christian. [WW141-148]
*Rest of Crusades in less detail until the fall of Akkon 1291
probably 20 million victims (in the Holy land and Arab/Turkish areas
alone). [WW224]
Note All figures according to contemporary (Christian) chroniclers.
Heretics
*Already in 385 C.E. the first Christians, the Spanish Priscillianus
and six followers, were beheaded for heresy in Trier/Germany [DO26]
*Manichaean heresy a crypto-Christian sect decent enough to practice
birth control (and thus not as irresponsible as faithful Catholics)
was exterminated in huge campaigns all over the Roman empire between
372 C.E. and 444 C.E. Numerous thousands of victims. [NC]
*Albigensians the first Crusade intended to slay other Christians.
[DO29]
The Albigensians (cathars = Christians allegedly that have all rarely
sucked) viewed themselves as good Christians, but would not accept
roman Catholic rule, and taxes, and prohibition of birth control. [NC]
Begin of violence on command of pope Innocent III (greatest single
pre-nazi mass murderer) in 1209. Beziérs (today France) 7/22/1209
destroyed, all the inhabitants were slaughtered. Victims (including
Catholics refusing to turn over their heretic neighbours and friends)
20,000-70,000. [WW179-181]
*Carcassonne 8/15/1209, thousands slain. Other cities followed.
[WW181]
*subsequent 20 years of war until nearly all Cathars (probably half
the population of the Languedoc, today southern France) were
exterminated. [WW183]
*After the war ended (1229) the Inquisition was founded 1232 to search
and destroy surviving/hiding heretics. Last Cathars burned at the
stake 1324. [WW183] *Estimated one million victims (cathar heresy
alone), [WW183]
*Other heresies Waldensians, Paulikians, Runcarians, Josephites, and
many others. Most of these sects exterminated, (I believe some
Waldensians live today, yet they had to endure 600 years of
persecution) I estimate at least hundred thousand victims (including
the Spanish inquisition but excluding victims in the New World).
*Spanish Inquisitor Torquemada alone allegedly responsible for 10,220
burnings. [DO28]
*John Huss, a critic of papal infallibility and indulgences, was
burned at the stake in 1415. [LI475-522]
*University professor B.Hubmaier burned at the stake 1538 in Vienna.
[DO59]
*Giordano Bruno, Dominican monk, after having been incarcerated for
seven years, was burned at the stake for heresy on the Campo dei Fiori
(Rome) on 2/17/1600.
Witches
*from the beginning of Christianity to 1484 probably more than several
thousand.
*in the era of witch hunting (1484-1750) according to modern scholars
several hundred thousand (about 80% female) burned at the stake or
hanged. [WV]
*incomplete list of documented cases
智者说过学习一种外语是为了从另一个视角重新审视我们身处的这个世界
Wiser said that：
To learn another absolutely different language can help you to see the world from another angle,and you will benefit a lot through this method.
白人们，麻烦问一下，你们的脑中除了26个字母的字母拼写系统以外，
还知不知道有另一个世界—地球上唯一的一个世界还在用着象形文字？
那里用占世界不到7%的土地养活了占世界20%的人口
那里的文明持续了五千年，而曾经的玛雅，埃及，苏美尔都已经变成了时间的沙砾
那里采用着与世界绝大多数国家不同的政治制度，有着世界上最大的海陆空军队以及NUCLEAR POWER
那里正在运行着世界上运营里程最长速度最快的高铁以及成为了
世界上仅有的三个可以独立发射载人火箭，出舱并建立空间站的国家
中华文明教育我们：和而不同，所以我们不会去征服一个国家，而是去交流去理解去做买卖
中国是不会不像白人那样剥着印第安人头皮玩的。
白人孩子们，你们在自诩26个英文字母成为世界通用语之前，好好审视一下自己血腥暴力的历史
这对你们提高IQ有好处。
中国正在重回他500年前应该所处的位置，尽管这500年来我们自己将我们的文明隔绝于世界之外
专制和封闭导致了我们暂时的经济落后，但我们正在奋起直追，2020年见分晓。
中国5000年来不惧怕任何形式的挑战
记住：千万不要惹一条左手握着原子弹，右手握着世界经济发动机的巨龙
REMEMBER: NEVER MAKE A GIANT DRAGON ANGRY WHOSE ATOM BOMB IN ITS LEFT HAND,
ENGINE OF THE WORLD ECONOMY IN ANOTHER HAND.
WE HAVE BEEN COMING BACK
NEXT WE WILL PLAY THE ROLE LIKE FIVE HUNDRED YEARS AGO
</strong>this is a highly racial article as clearly </em><u></u>disregard<u></u><em>the history of india do you know India was the first place where education was public…. we called them gurukuls and not modern day schools which indeed were introduced by the English. World’s first university was built in India.. and you talk of us having poor education. There are more illiterates in US than in India inspite of our massive population.
<strong>what I think is that modern IQ testing is totally unfair because it does not take into account one’s first language and ability of communication in other languages
<strong></strong><em></em><u></u>some fact here-
we Indians were fisrt to calculate the distance b/w sun and earth, earth and moon, size of milky way about 3000 years back. Our holy scriptutres mention of aeroplanes, helicopters, missiles even in the age when world was still mainly nomadic, in maths…rather half of it is by India.. we invented Calculus 2000 years before Newton, Pythogoras Theorem was known to us since 500 years before greeks, taylor series was made in India about 1100 years ago, 0 was brought into existence by us….our 5000 year old scriptures mention of IVF, cloning, inter- galactic travel…..................there is lots more and i cant stop writing
this is a highly racist article as clearly disregard the history of india do you know India was the first place where education was public…. we called them gurukuls and not modern day schools which indeed were introduced by the English. World’s first university was built in India.. and you talk of us having poor education. There are more illiterates in US than in India inspite of our massive population.
what I think is that modern IQ testing is totally unfair because it does not take into account one’s first language and ability of communication in other languages
some fact here-
we Indians were fisrt to calculate the distance b/w sun and earth, earth and moon, size of milky way about 3000 years back. Our holy scriptutres mention of aeroplanes, helicopters, missiles even in the age when world was still mainly nomadic, in maths…rather half of it is by India.. we invented Calculus 2000 years before Newton, Pythogoras Theorem was known to us since 500 years before greeks, taylor series was made in India about 1100 years ago, 0 was brought into existence by us….our 5000 year old scriptures mention of IVF, cloning, inter- galactic travel…..................there is lots more and i cant stop writing
I am an upper cast Hindu, from East India (West Bengal, for those who want precision).
For me, it is not difficult to understand why India fares so low in terms of average I.Q. tests. Who are we kidding when most of the population still struggle to make two ends meet? The lower section of the society is dually cursed: First is the ancient cast system which ensured they do not get access to any mental stimulation, the second is the corrupt political scenario in the country. Together these all result in malnutrtion, poverty and lack of oppertunities, and worse, a prevalent menrality that certain scetions of the society don’t really deserve attention. Even the people belonging to that section start believing that.
I writemy response with such humbleness</strong> not because I doubt the potential of India.
Quite on the contrary… Because <strong>I believe that the first step towards achieveing that potential is to recognize and accept and embrace the areas where we lack.
It saddens me specially to see Indians turning against each others. Claiming Northern supremity over Southern, and vise versa.
It is even more saddenning to see that we, the upper cast Hindus, sight cast system and the resulting damage to the Indian population as a means to secure our own ego ” XX% brahmin population and other upper casts”. As if it does not matter that the rest of the country is struggling and falling behind their full ppotential, as long as we get our badge of the “genetically advanced, higher IQ minority”.
To the Chinese participants... I envy the solidarity. I do not agree with all that you have written, but, I admire the fact that not one Chinese person has pointed finger to another, claiming they could have even a higher IQ score had certain section of the populace not been present.
This in itslef is a great eye opener to anyone who wonders why India manages to fall behind in aggregate terms, while individual Indians show brilliance. Because we have a long, long way to go before we identify ourselves as Indians. </strong<strong>>, and not on basis of cast, language or region.
Note: Ironically enough, the introduction i have given for myself is meant for fellow Indians.
Thanks.
What all you people are failing to consider is the possibility that IQ tests are not a valid measure of intelect. First of all, Raven’s Progresive Matrices, which alot of these studies are done with, uses INDUCTIVE REASONING. The problems blatantly demand inductive reasoning, which is a non-rigorous form of reasoning, and not critical to the sciences in the manner that deductive reasoning is. This is an issue that has not been addressed in the literature at sufficient length at all, but, as a Cognitive Psychology grad student, you can rest assured, I will make sure that it is studied at length. I’m sure Raven’s progresive matrices must say something about certain cognitive functions but it is not the be all end all. Furthermore, what these “scientists” fail to realize is that some cultures may simply not give a shit about some stupid IQ test and their idea of effort is… uhh… no effort. The Roma studies are highly credulous for example. Just so everyone knows, the level of “effort” on one of these tests is gauged by the clinician who administers the test in a bullshit qualitative way, it is highly non-rigorous. Lastly, the correlation between IQ and achievment, that means actual real life achievment, is positive, but weak. Now, some people will say “it is moderate!!” Wrong, moderate correlations; R=.5, translate into an R^2 of .25. It’s R^2 that is the important part, that’s the part that tell syou the strength of the relationship, and according to mainstream (but ill informed sources) it signifies “variance accounted for” (this is an ill informed interpretation of R^2 but we’ll roll with it). An R^2 of .25 means that the majority of the variance in the dependent variable, say, ACHIEVMENT, is NOT acounted for by variance in the independent variable IQ. Not to mention the relationship is asymptotic, meaning that as IQ approaches infinity d(achievment)/d(IQ) approaches 0 (the derivitive). What this means is that a really, really high IQ isn’t gonna make that big of a difference for a person in life, in comparison to a person with a high IQ. To cut a long story short, IQ just isn’t the most important thing in whether or not you succeede in life, so stop worrying about it.
[quote=Bliss]
Ethnic Chinese have won 2 Fields Medals vs 0 for ethnic Indians.
lol I noticed you said “ethnic Chinese” instead of “China IMO medalists”...the fact is 0 China IMO medalists from China have won a Fields Medal. Tao is from Australia and his contributions aren’t significant so I don’t know how he won, I guess the Fields Medal committee is a joke now. Chern’s contributions are more significant but he’s from the US not from China and he’s from the distant past.
If Ramanujan lived during the time period that the Fields Medal existed he would’ve won a Fields Medal, so going back to the distant past doesn’t mean much.
So your 2 “ethnic Chinese from non-Chinese countries” only shows that the Chinese can’t independently do anything.
What’s come out from China (not Chinese in non-Chinese countries) since 1986 when China started ranking high in the IMO?
The fact is Chinese in China performs the best in the IMO so where are all of China’s contributions to go with it?
The only reasonable answer is that the Chinese are genetically incapable of contributing. We know this because the Chinese in non-Chinese countries who rank high in the IMO also go on to contribute very little (like Lenny Ng).
On the other India since the year 2000 has already won the Abel Prize (Nobel Prize equivalent), Rolf Nevanlinna prize (Nobel Prize equivalent), and created the first primality testing algorithm proven to run in polynomial time (which is much more significant than the Green-Tao theorem).
Since there are lots of Indians who have made Fields Medal worthy contributions not winning a Fields Medal isn’t really significant for India considering India’s malnutrition and illiteracy rates. The Fields Medal committee is just a joke now.
India will probably win a Fields Medal in 2014 and/or 2018.
On the other hand what’s China’s explanation for no Chinese IMO medalists from China winning a Fields Medal or Abel Prize or any high ranking mathematical prize given out for contributions despite ranking extremely high?
The only explanation is that the Chinese are genetically incapable of contributing, they disproved the validity of many contests lol.
Ranking high in the IMO doesn’t even mean much. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (PRK) also have high rankings, but they were disqualified twice for cheating and have no significant mathematical contributions.
Basically any country can artificially raise their rankings in contests if they wanted to.
So China’s high rankings in contests not correlating with contributions out from China only proves that the Chinese are genetically incapable of contributing, they are just like robots.
</u>
Three Japanese and a Vietnamese have also won the Fields Medal. Vietnam also performs much better than India in the International Math Olympiad. So does Iran.
Japan, Vietnam, and Iran also perform much better than France in the IMO, but France has 11 Fields Medals and a much lower population size than those combined.
France also has more Fields Medals than all three of those countries combined.
Having high rankings in the IMO without contributions to correlate clearly shows us that the Chinese are incapable of contributing.
The Wolf Prize in mathematics has been won by 3 Japanese and 2 Chinese mathematicians vs 0 Indians.
The Wolf Prize in Physics which is second to the Nobels in prestige has been won by 2 Japanese and 1 Chinese vs 0 Indians.
The Wolf Prize in Chemistry has been won once by a Chinese but never by an Indian.
The Wolf Prize in Medicine has been won by 3 Japanese vs 0 Indians/south Asians.
Lol since the year 1984 East Asians have a sum total of 3 Wolf Math Prizes?
The total literate population of East Asians is like 1400 million+ so we would expect them to be contributing much more than not just Indians but the entire WORLD.
India still has a lower literate population size than both Europeans and East Asians.
Since the year 2000:
The Abel Prize (nearly equal to a Fields Medal) has been won by 1 Indian but 0 East Asians
The Nevanlinna Prize has been by 1 Indian but 0 East Asians
The AKS Primality test was developed by 3 Indians in India and 0 East Asians
Clay Research Award won by 2 Indians and 1 Chinese
Gödel Prize won by 7+ Indians and 1 Chinese
Considering India’s human development, average IQ, and literate population size India is contributing dis-proportionally more than the Chinese.
Cut the stupid ghetto jive-talking already. You are not fooling anyone. The only relics of an advanced civilization that are found in India are those that were built by foreign rulers, the turko-mongol muslim Mughals and the white Christian British. The Hindus were never able to create an advanced civilization, probably because of the asinine caste system.
lol stop lying to yourself. Don’t make me laugh.
What was advanced about China? The majority of Chinese inventions don’t require much intellect at all and are simply the result of Chinese culture.
Obviously since China was the only civilization in the world that had the culture to build machines for 2000+ years we would expect China to have the most machines during that time. We would’ve also expected any civilization that has the culture to build machines for 2000+ years to figure out steam technology, but China didn’t.
Having lots of inventions that do not require much intelligence over a 2000+ year period when China had the culture advantage isn’t a sign of advancement, it’s a sign of a lack of advancement.
The only reason people mistakenly believe that China was so advanced is because they don’t factor in culture.
Basically any civilization that has the culture to build machines for 2000+ years would’ve been able to come up with China’s inventions or more.
Gunpowder, paper, woodblock printing, the primitive compass, and basically all of China’s primitive inventions don’t require much intelligence at all to figure out, just simple experimenting and guessing.
The reason why basically every Chinese invention had been surpassed by Arabs and Europeans in the 13th-16th Century is specifically because nearly all Chinese inventions don’t require much intelligence.
India had been much more advanced than China in mathematics, linguistics, astronomy, philosophy, metallurgy, plumbing, and every area besides inventions:
- Indian philosophy is the only one comparable to Greek philosophy, the logic and concepts in Indian texts can easily rival or surpass everything in Greek philosophy
- Indian astronomy had been the most advanced until the time of Johannes Kepler in the 17th century, the Chinese thought the earth was flat and square until the 17th Century LOL
- Kerala school’s mathematical analysis remained the most advanced form of mathematics until the 18th Century
- Indus Valley plumbing system remained the most advanced until the 19th Century
- Pāṇini’s morphological analysis had remained the most advanced until the mid-20th Century
- The classical and traditional manner that Indian high-carbon Wootz steel was manufactured has still yet to be re-discovered in modern times
If anyone doubts any statement above just double-check it and see if it’s true.
The reason why many of the things Indians did were only surpassed much later on is specifically because they require much more intelligence than China’s primitive inventions.
The Kerala school’s mathematical analysis alone requires more intelligence than not some but rather ALL of China’s primitive inventions.
The only thing China can get ahead of India in is copying, lol.
Technologically, economically, militarily, organizationally, in practically every way east Asia is miles and miles ahead of south Asia. You look very, very stupid bragging about India which is poorer, hungrier, filthier, shabbier than almost any other place on earth.
lol China finally got around to figuring out that the earth wasn’t flat and square in the 17th century and now in modern times all they can do is learn and copy from others, not contribute.
East Asians have the very highest literate population in the entire world and also a high average IQ yet they contribute dis-proportionally very little.
Since East Asians have the highest literate population size, perform well in contests, and have high average IQs why do they contribute so very little? It’s because they’re genetically incapable of making contributions that require originality.
India has a low average IQ, high illiteracy rates, high malnutrition rates, a lower literate population than both East Asians and Europeans and Indians still contribute dis-proportionally more than the Chinese.
Japan doesn’t even have it’s own national defense, the US provides Japan with most of it’s national defense. If a country doesn’t have to worry much about national defense spending building up infrastructure and an economy would be much easier. So much of Japan’s success comes directly from the US.
Right now India really is poor. But India is just beginning to become developed, so we don’t really know India’s potential yet. One of the main challenges India faces is that it’s even more over-crowded than Japan.
China on the other hand has been ranking high in contests for 25 years and China has no significant contributions. So we can see that China has already reached it’s limits and exhausted all it’s potential.
Everything China has been doing are things that any country can do (copying infrastructure, ranking high in contests that have do with copying, copying national defense programs, and other things involving copying).
Even if China achieves the best economy in the world all they’ll be doing is copying, not contributing.
Since India is still developing itself we don’t really know how strong India’s economy or national defense will become. Once India’s literacy rate goes above 90% and internet usage goes above 30% India would’ve obviously surpassed robotic China in every imaginable field.
India is just beginning to un-tap it’s potential where as China has already exhausted it’s potential.
@ Indian Catholic
1) I don’t think so. There is no such religion as “Hinduism” it is simply a geographical term used to refer to all Indian religions in India (except for Buddhism, Jainism, and Carvaka).
So which Indian religion are you referring to when you say “Hinduism”?
Many things in Indian philosophy contain concepts that are far more advanced than things found in Judeo-Christian religions. Physicists like Erwin Schrödinger and Robert Oppenheimer were interested in Vedantic philosophy.
Of course the philosophical concepts in Indian religions are nothing like the Ganesh or Brahma version of “Hinduism” that is often portrayed in the media.
What a shame that the media portrays “Hinduism” to be such a primitive religion when in reality Indian religions are truthfully more advanced than all other major religions besides Buddhism.
2) Pagan religions? Are Vedantic, Advaita Vedantic, and other monistic/monotheistic Indian religions considered Pagan?
3) lol, Islam is an off-shoot of Judaism and Christianity, not “Hinduism”. In Islam they believe in the same prophets that Christians and Jews believe in.
Where did you get the idea that Islam is an off-shoot of “Hinduism”? Most Indian religions are nothing like Islam at all. Judaism is very similar to Islam and Christianity is some what similar to Islam.
4) Or a solution would be to switch to the more advanced Indian religions like that of the Vedantists instead of the later Puranic Indian religions.
Vedantists believe that reality is an illusion generated by our sensory perceptions and that all that really exists is the one true unborn God who is beyond our sensory perception. It is nothing like other Indian religions.
“As dreams, illusions and castles in the air are viewed, so is the tangible universe viewed by the wise, well versed in Vedanta”
“By direct perception, logical deduction, scriptural testimony and personal realization, one should know that this world has a beginning and an end and so is not the ultimate reality. Thus one should live in this world without attachment”
“The Absolute Truth, which alone was present before the creation of the universe and which alone will remain after its destruction, is also the time factor and the ultimate cause. Even in the middle stage of this creation’s existence, the Absolute Truth alone is the actual reality.”
I do not think the data is accurate in a way. It’s all about what era you’re talking about. For example if you check stastic a hundred years ago. You would like chinese is not high of iq because of the economic conditions does not allow chinese to go to school. The other factor is what percentage you’re talking about for example genetic happen randomly. If your population is 3000 percent number of people then genetic random of super smart people would be high than the other population.
What I would like to say is that there is no such population smart forever or stupid forever it all depend of economic conditions, the generic ramdon number how big of your population, the cultures how much family encourage children to learn and challenge and other factors.
At this era, Indian and Chinese pupolation is high and the economic have been improving; therefore, will see more of success. The Jews has learn a great lessons about race termination; therefore they family cultures invoke them to be more selfdefend by take more knowledge to defend themself.
If there a WW3, then whoever win the WW3 would have the most IQs because their economic would be improve. It’s all dawnwin evolution.
Therefore your comments and your statistic only for racism or nationalism to make you feel better.
Please do not be a victim of Racism and have your own judgment.
评论
优点英语 For Android
手机扫描二维码下载到手机直接点击二维码下载到电脑
