Putin reveals hypersonic stealth bomber that can launch nuclear attacks from SPACE and travel anywhere in the world in two hours

普京透露超音速隐形轰炸机可从太空发送核攻击,2小时内科打击世界任一角落
Larisa Brown for the Daily Mail

国外网友评论 0人跟帖    9642人参与

Taofledermaus
Who did they steal the technology from, THIS time?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Brian GrifffinReply toTaofledermaus
Seriously dude. America has piggybacked on everything for the last 100 yes. Computer: British. Jet engine British. Ballistic missile Germans. The list is long. Using someone else's tech and or making it better is the way it is . You, us and everyone.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
FeddupReply toTaofledermaus
And you can bet the 'Sabre' engine technology will be got by General Electric or Pratt & Whitney - somehow!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
blocksofReply toTaofledermaus
You find the Russian always had good engineers, just that America had better pay and living conditions.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MrBeanBean
They are developing this whilst currently there are over 20 million Russians living in poverty?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
IloveUKReply toMrBeanBean
who told you this? American news?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MrBeanBeanReply toMrBeanBean
IloveUK, this isn't American propaganda, it's official UN information...
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
David HardingReply toMrBeanBean
Russians who have escaped russia to live in safety here in spain and are getting their familys out as quickly as they can.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
SaveTheBadgersReply toMrBeanBean
Is the US much different? It spends so much on its military that it cannot afford to treat its citizens when they fall ill. If you're poor in the US - and there are millions - you get sick, you die.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Vitaly ZagryadskyReply toMrBeanBean
MrBeanBean. So Russia must do to live well? To become a colony of the West?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
IloveUKReply toMrBeanBean
MrBeanBean - You believe everything the UN say? One thing is for sure in Russia. If you hungry your neighbors will feed you will love and respect.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
RussiantrollReply toMrBeanBean
What's of it? 50 million of Americans live in poverty.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
mort dogReply toMrBeanBean
i didn't realise how popular a read the DM is in Russia.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GilbertReply toMrBeanBean
Russiatroll ..even the poorest American is better off than an average Russian. millions of Russians are trying to get to the US !!! 100 million Russians are living in abject poverty with a life expectancy below 55 !!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Ample AssetReply toMrBeanBean
IloveUK is definitely one of those who believes in every single conspiracy theory there is out there
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
RussiantrollReply toMrBeanBean
Gilbert. MAy be it's because Russia still struggle consequences of WW2 that what lead on it's territory? While America benefited much from it?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
jbReply toMrBeanBean
How many people use food banks in the uk?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Molecule ManReply toMrBeanBean
US spends 10 times more than Russia and it has 50 million living in poverty. Britain spends just as much as Russia and it has millions living in poverty.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
DanxxReply toMrBeanBean
hah last time i was in england i see homeless people sleeping rough on the streets..
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MrBeanBeanReply toMrBeanBean
@jb believe what you want, everyone gets fed in the UK.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MrBeanBeanReply toMrBeanBean
Wow, so many Russian trolls.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Robert Perry20Reply toMrBeanBean
@Danxx I would rather see hobos and typhoons, and not council houses and swords.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
agaragarinReply toMrBeanBean
Don't call someone a troll for just having a different opinion.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Superdragon
They didn't unveil anything. Another Russian pipe dream.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
AdMReply toSuperdragon
until it happens...
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
tony
Only one flaw in the plan. By the time the plane flew back to its home base all that would be there would be a pile of radioactive rubble.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
NoXenophobiaReply totony
Yours also. Don't forget about it
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Andy PandyReply totony
Remember every one that includes Russia China North Korea and any other country with Nuclear weapons that it all comes down to MAD Mutual Assured Destruction. Want to press the button!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GroundrushReply totony
There is another huge flaw in the plan... The top image shows what looks to be a swing wing (so 1960s) air frame. If someone thinks that lugging wing linkages and the power to move such wings to altitude then they have miss understood the word "payload". The aircraft in the wind tunnel has a very interesting wing form for what one would assume is supersonic. Still the Russians have political will and with funding you can do anything.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Raptor75Reply totony
I wouldn't worry too much about this, it is another Russian paper dragon. Their economy is in the tank and they can't even field their new fighter jet the T-50 because of a verity of technical issues including its engines.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Voice of SenseReply totony
Raptor we shall not mention the F35 shall we... you drop kick,.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Paulm69Reply totony
Tony..we have the ability to kill hugely..have a look for what plans the government has to protect our lives if deterrence fails. We have no civil defence programme at all..There is nowhere to seek safety, no nuclear bunkers for the public..we just die if deterrence fails and it all goes bad.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
hardboiledReply totony
They seem to have forgotten that countries fight back!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Happy ExpatReply totony
Retractable wings in hypersonic flight = recipe for supercavitating airframe destruction.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
snusnu
Well done obama for restarting the arms race
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
webfootReply tosnusnu
Let's nominate him for another Nobel peace prize!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JimmyReply tosnusnu
Obama ? Hoe did you manage to link him to this article ?? next time you have constipation you will say the same ?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JohnReply tosnusnu
Jimmy, when it comes to constipation, Obama is the one that's full of ****.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JimmyReply tosnusnu
ha ha . ok that made me chuckle John .
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Mike
I am reading the negative comments about Russian technology but many British lives have been lost through inept US technology. In the mean time Russia is bombing ISIS from 1500 miles away with an accuracy of a couple of metres.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
webfootReply toMike
Are you forgetting the Russian cruise missiles that landed in Iran?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GlebRussiaReply toMike
Only two of the 15 incredible accuracy actually.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GilbertReply toMike
Russia fired a dozen cruise missiles from Caspian sea, as it turned out it was a show, the missiles were lost ..lol
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ApostalypseReply toMike
Most of Russia's bombing is with unguided area weapons. Cheap and effective, especially if you don't care about collateral damage.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Paul_Xavier_Green
You do realise you're essentially staring at a concept multi-purpose Spaceship? Don't write the Russians off so easily. They're very good at springing technological surprises on the world - fact!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Morpheus Nucleus
We dont hate you Russia. Unite against common enemies.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Brigadier Mustard
Russian technology is starting to take hold, time to stop treating Russia as though everything is a rusting wreck.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Oak Tree
russian technology has really outpaced the US, we don't even have the technology to put people in the international space station we pay russia to do that.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
webfootReply toOak Tree
That situation has nothing to do with technology, just gross mismanagement by politicians.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Morpheus NucleusReply toOak Tree
When they can make a better bit of kit than my iPhone, let me know.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Govt-inactionReply toOak Tree
They can't even build automobiles that are any good.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GilbertReply toOak Tree
Spacex technology is 20 years ahead of anything Russia can offer pal..
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
DamianYK
'Designed' on an Etcha Sketch with a set square........
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
mr cactus
I bet the Americans have their own plane already.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
PtahReply tomr cactus
Considering how massive US debt is, I wouldn't be surprised.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Basil brush
Drop a nuclear weapon and 'return to base', how comforting. In reality 'the base' will,have gone missing well before the bomber returns , along with everything else.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
salubrious1Reply toBasil brush
Yep, Mutually assured destruction.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Martin
Ah! Another Concordsky in the making. What Russia promises and what it is capable of delivering are 2 different things.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MuadDib
I'm all for leaps in technology, and understand the funding for the militaries, but lately there's so much war and killing in the world.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
UlatecReply toMuadDib
War = Technological Progress , sad but true . If there was no war we would be in loincloths chasing poultry and game for lunch instead of exchanging message over the internet right now.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Warren McIntoshReply toMuadDib
Lol, ironically enough compared to virtually all of human history there's hardly any. You live in a paradise of peace compared to other centuries.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
blocksofReply toMuadDib
War leads to advances in technology, which filters back to us during peacetime.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MarkD
Submarine launched missiles would have destroyed its base before it could return. Pointless posturing.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
madmanc
why send a monstrous sized bomber when you can send a missile with multiple warheads?.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Barry CentricReply tomadmanc
because you can launch satellites, move quickly to other parts of the globe, seed mines in space, all sorts of reasons
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Pairofdice
If its anything like the Russian version of Concord it will not get very far
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
DennisReply toPairofdice
I was about to say, does anyone remember the Tupolev Tu 144? At the Paris air show. Bang!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
joydividionReply toPairofdice
yeas, any one remember de Havilland Comet.....bang bang bang, bang....you British are not able to produce even trainer aircraft any more.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
BohicaReply toPairofdice
I guess you don't realise that NASA leases the two last remaining Concordskis (TU-144) as experiential platforms and weather chasing. Yes they had a tragic crash, but moved on from it and kept the remaining planes flying.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
PairofdiceReply toPairofdice
Who woke you up
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
davidhoffman5Reply toPairofdice
Dennis, The Paris crash was caused by the French government flying a spy plane in what was supposed to be sterile airspace.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
hwyhobo
"Two engines¿one for the airplane and another for the spaceship¿will be combined within the bomber's engine setting. " -- Will be? I thought the article said it was already successfully tested?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
DaveResnamReply tohwyhobo
It is. It's a British invention which used to be called the Hotol engine but it didn't get government funding under the Labour government.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
stevo145
.......There would be no 'Base' to return to so what is the point...
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]

评论

游客 请登录 注册