Putin reveals hypersonic stealth bomber that can launch nuclear attacks from SPACE and travel anywhere in the world in two hours
普京透露超音速隐形轰炸机可从太空发送核攻击,2小时内科打击世界任一角落
Larisa Brown for the Daily Mail
Matt
There's a fundamental problem with this, going supersonic let alone hypersonic negates all stealth, you're trailing a sonic boom behind the plane and a massive shock cone, there's also a huge amount of heat generated which negates stealth again. There's always been a balance between the two, even when a plane has a reduced RCS it's in no way stealth at hypersonic speeds.buzzingworld
And one day someone somewhere is going to be tempted to use these lethal toys.... hopefully not in my life time but I do worry about those being born today..... or even those born before today. If only all this advanced technology was being put towards civilian purposes and galactic research, but somehow I doubt the story would end there. Shame on us as human beings. We seem to have a rogue gene in us that precursors a self-destruct mode when we cannot control our emotions or political avarice.Theproff
[Pannman - it is air breathing - muuppet]. The similar Lapat or Skylon spacecraft was projected to have a takeoff weight of 250 tonnes, using the air-breathing engine technology to save a great deal of weight. But the Russian equivalent cannot be using air-breathing technology as the fuel is said to be kerosene. The air-breathing cycle needs the low temperatures of hydrogen, to power the heat exchangers, which this Russian equivalent does not have. In which case, the Russian spacecraft would have to weigh more than 500 tonnes, and the muuppet is yourself.Topo Gigio
Nuclear weapons are so 20th century! Check out kinetic space weapons to see where the future lies. Since they do not leave a radioactive wasteland, atmospheric dust cloud,or incur enormous upkeep costs while creating just as much devastation at their target, they, unfortunately, are where the space arms race is at. I also suspect they are why Iran agreed to quit their nuclear weapon program. Can someone confirm this aircraft can be fitted with them?Dennis
Lockheed Martin at the Skunk Works had enormous trouble getting the SR71 up to Mach 3.2. The Russians are talking about Mach 5. The mind boggles.ten33
Not sure why you'd need it, given a ballistic missile can reach any target much quicker and with less chance of it being intercepted, plus the fact it seems somewhat overly optimistic to believe there would be a base to return to in a full-scale conflict anyway. But there again military spending is never logicalAndy_hudds
They couldn't just make this for a passenger plane and benefit all of mankind?