China won't allow chaos or war on Korean peninsula: Xi

习近平:中国决不允许朝鲜半岛出现混乱与战争
Michael Martina

国外网友评论 0人跟帖    8320人参与

Uncertainty Inc., 2

American Voters:

Okay, it is foreign policy testing time for the wanna be, trust fund baby, Trump.

Trump has called out careless and reckless rhetoric to leave Pacific/Asian nations to their own defense. Now, Trump says that if diplomacy does not work out, he would simply walk away from the table. China and Russia would eat him up and the trust fund baby would be left a babbling fool.

Does this mean that the trust fund baby would pull U.S. Military deployments in the Pacific back to Hawaii? He would leave allies from Australia and up through Taiwan exposed an vulnerable? And just how vulnerable would that leave our western front?

Our U.S. Military knows where we should be deployed, and I don't give an rat's rant what a careless and reckless rhetoric from a trust fund baby thinks our foreign policy should be.

Opinion from an Independent voter/Vietnam veteran who thinks that what he is really talking about is an Isolationist Policy for our already great nation, closing global market agreements, insecure sea lanes, and who wins? Billionaires. Who loses and gets hit with unimaginable inflation? The 99%.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Free LiberalReply toUncertainty Inc., 2

It would be hard to find a worse President than Trump, except for Hilliary or Bernie.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Free LiberalReply toUncertainty Inc., 2

Gary Johnson for President.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
RandyReply toUncertainty Inc., 2

Trump will have advisers and his decisions will be thought out and tempered. He is called "the blue collar billionaire" for a reason and anyone will be a big step up from we currently have.,

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Uncertainty Inc., 2Reply toUncertainty Inc., 2

@Randy: Where did you ever get the notion that the trust fund baby is a blue collar billionaire? Absolutely baseless from Trump who, himself, has asserted and acknowledged that the Democrats make strong economies coming out of recessions. Trump would deliver for the billionaire club. Hillary would deliver for the 99%. Trump and the GOP know that. That is what has them frightened into panic, and you are reflecting what they, Trump and the GOP have been lying to you about.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Free LiberalReply toUncertainty Inc., 2

Hillary has announced that she will continue Obama's polices to destroy the middle class and enrich the elite.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
PaleMoon

King Cobra,

"Military ships sailing in international waters a provocation? So if a chinese navy sub comes within 200 miles of the US coast, is it also a provocation???".

Japanese troll SOP exercising as usual.

#2 Playing dumb and street screaming like delusional Filipino trolls.

On the other hand, it is called "freedom of navigation, American style".

Most of all, US has not signed onto UNCLOS.

Therefore, only 12 miles, not 200 miles.

LMAO!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GoBlueGrad

Until China gets rid of that syphilitic little chancre currently running North Korea, they will have to bear the brunt of international criticism for allowing him free rein to terrorize the world.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
VladimirReply toGoBlueGrad

Do you mean US & and its clients?

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GoBlueGradReply toGoBlueGrad

LOL @ poor Vlad! Do you and your vodka-swilling comrades think that the Fat Little Boy would limit his nuclear capabilities to the U.S. and its many allies?

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
PaleMoon

#$%$,

"THAAD is what is needed in South Korea and it will solve part of the problem with Chyna and reduce its reliance on its faulty confidence.".

Same as before, Japanese trolls like you need to more focus instead of keep using the old anti-China scripts over, over and over again.

LMAO.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
R

I see 1 of 2 things when it comes to China & N. Korea 1 China is far weaker then we believe them to be and are simply afraid of NK or and most likely NK is doing nothing more than what China is directing them to do

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Robert

how can they stop it with the idiot in charge of N. Korea

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
VladimirReply toRobert

The 'idiot' will meet his fate any day now!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
SeriousJoker99Reply toRobert

China does not intend to stop the "idiot" they want him to attack SK and the US

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
KimReply toRobert

china wants kim dum flung duck dung to start a war....its in their game plan....

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Joseph2237

Test of character is coming because I think N Korea is doing what China wants...for the area to become unstable so the Chinese have standing to claim more territory for their expansion.Kim takes the heat as bad boy, china cleans up on land, and the US has to show some character. Problem is they are so far away from us by the time we hear and react the whole thing could be over.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Photoman

Then he better get the little Fat Boy in line. The US will NOT allow North Korea to station a submarine off our coast, equipped with nuclear ballistic missiles. Xi needs to put a short leash on that mad dog before he creates an incident that turns the Korean peninsula into a red hot wasteland.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
KEN

Trump will fix it all. He will be HUGE. America will be Great. Maybe. But only if he's elected. If he loses, it's the end of the world. And, Bernie really needs to run as an independent . By the way, that IS real, genuine Pekinese Trump wears on top of his head. His other rug is genuine Pomeranian.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
To Be

Why does everyone keep saying "technically they are at war". That is completely wrong.

Are we at war with everyone we do not have a treaty saying we are not at war with them? No, that would be ridiculous.

Technically you need to actually be fighting a war to "technically" be at war. The lack of an official peace treaty does not make them at war.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Richard

And if the little fat kid launches a missile at someone, the Chinese are going to prevent a response? They certainly can't stop the first launch, now can they?

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
dink_the_doughnut

"BEIJING (Reuters) - China will not allow security on the Korean Peninsula to deteriorate, China's President Xi Jinping said on Thursday at a security meeting with foreign ministers from Asia.

(Reporting by Michael Martina; Editing by Paul Tait)"

Is it the reporting or the editing that blows in this story?

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Jeremy

Enjoy your lead now china as soon this Weak President will be gone and you are going to be dealing with an AMERICA that is #$%$ off. Our soon to be president Mr. Trump is going to squash you and your sorry #$%$. AMERICA FIRST!!!!!!!!!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
michaelRlulz

Meanwhile while China professes this N. Korea keeps developing more nukes and China won't be able to stop them eventually.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
BrettReply tomichaelRlulz

They will eventually have to decide whether to remove Kim from power or go to war with them. If he chooses the latter its WWIII.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
zababafoolReply tomichaelRlulz

@ m Why does''t the US get rid of the missiles ??? Why is US telling countries what they can and cannot have ??? Who anointed the US to be the police of the World ??? NK should continue to do what they do !!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Nathaniel

Xie has full head of black hair and is very handsome man, looking many years younger than his age...But he is using North Korea as his proxy to endanger the South Korea, Japan and the United States. Unless China invades North Korea and cnages its regime, removing all missiles and nukes, war is very much inevitable !!!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
EricReply toNathaniel

Glad you find him so attractive

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Waldo

well, if President 11 is so adamant about "peace on the peninsula", then why did China sit idlely by as the Bad Haircut Boy developed nukes??? how does THAT "stabilize the far east"??? hard to decide who is more FOS over there...but with ObamASS at the helm, it is a wonder that Venezeula doesn't have the bomb...or the Vatican...

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Phillip

China will not allow chaos and war to break out on the Korean peninsula, which would be to no one's advantage because their bff NK will just get their ax kicked again and they will have to spend a $trillion coming to their rescue. Again.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Donald DuckReply toPhillip

They do not want to deal with streams of NK refugees if the country fails apart... same for SK. The fall of the Berlin Wall and Germany's unification severely taxed West German resources, and it still has some effect. Also, a unified Korea might mean that the NK border has changed to one that is influenced by Western powers.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ROBReply toPhillip

wwould that be a joke! US troops on China's border! China would be crying like the Russians!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JohnReply toPhillip

If Korea was united and peaceful the US could bring all those troops home. Simple.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
BERT

China protects North Korea and Russia protects Iran. Neither country would even exist without that protection. Why?

Because both Russia and China are so weak that they need uber bad guys to deter or balance their lack of power vis a vis the USA and Europe.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Kurt

Did Xi tell Fat Boy and his minion generals bout this policy?

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Chris

Nice to see some of the world's weaker nations like PRC step up and offer rhetoric with no decisive action in regard to their puppet kim sukcum.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]

评论

游客 请登录 注册