Moscow warns Holland of ‘grave consequences’ after Russian aircraft carrier forces Dutch submarine to flee when it detects it following its fleet in the Mediterranean

莫斯科发现在地中海有荷兰潜水艇跟踪俄国航空母舰,警告其如再跟踪将后果自负
Hannah Al-othman For Mailonline

国外网友评论 0人跟帖    11209人参与

boosters
Had a second read of that, I thought it was a DM reporter talking about the French guy.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
friendlyric
Rubbish, Has Russia never heard of Satellite monitoring. Also a type 45 destroyer could listen to there ships from half a world away no need for Submarines,
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
mountaindweller
getting very busy in the med sea what with the US 5th fleet which has in the Med Sea the USN Dwight D.Eisenhower Carrier Strike force , with 4 additional AB destroyers attached to it , along with the French carrier and UK Joint Expeditionary Force, plus other coalition naval ships , that's approx. 230 fixed wing aircraft and helicopters, compared to Russians 15
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
jasper
Its a game all the sides play. A big boys 'hide and seek'!!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
mememe
'Could have had grave navigational consequences' is not the same as warning of grave consequences! The clue is in 'could have had'! Stop scaremongering!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Fred House
It would make a good comedy sketch with Harry Enfield & Paul Whitehouse as submarine captains moving on from their roles as Dutch police officers.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Jonah
As if Russia doesn't do the same with NATO.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
crisser
It's the submarines they didn't detect that matter.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
SMEE
Navigational consequences DM. Misleading headline, on purpose I can only imagine. Who is pulling your strings on all this anti Russia sh it? I thought the media was supposed to not be misleading.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
HumanBeing
Russia chased this sub because its close to their carrier group (spying) so they asked/chased to move "away". They did not said like "you dont belong in Mediterranean". NATO/UK ships followed Russian fleet in English channel, everyone was okay with it because they informed about this months ago but this incident is different.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Working_man
What's the point in snooping on it. It's not a secret where the carrier is going. I know and I'm sat in my living room.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
papercut2008uk
Now Is is almost out of the way, we need another thing to be scared of to fill that gap.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
noall kirke
Holland has a sub????....subway you mean....surely??
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Fairplay3
Utter rubbish comment.............."Putin may launch attack on the West". There are powerful people in the West who are hoping for a war, now that Trump has been elected there is less chance of that happening.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Bebek66Reply toFairplay3
I like Edmonton.Great place, so near to the Rockies.Is it -40 Deg C yet? :)
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
thankgod4daatlanticReply toFairplay3
no Bebek66, having an awesome autumn +16 today.......
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
gsp
We watch, and more important, listen to theirs, they watch and listen to ours.Nothing new, move along please, make room for a bit of news.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
One of us
ops... one word deliberately omitted ... he said "grave navigational consequences"... it changes the meaning a bit doesn't it?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
scifi
You dont need a sub to track that10 smoke detectors from local ironmongers will do the trick
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
steve
What a joke. You didn't need a sub to follow it. The plume of smoke was enough to follow it.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
DevilKnight
Not still banging on about this drivel are you DM? Nothings going on. Move on.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
superblanik
The amount of smoke the aircraft carrier was spewing on their transit of the English Channel suggests that it doesn't need to be shadowed by a submarine.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]

评论

游客 请登录 注册