Did a Ukrainian fighter jet shoot down MH17? Eye witness accounts claim Boeing 777 may have been targeted by another plane
乌克兰战斗机击落马航?目击者声称看到波音777被飞机击落
Poppy Danby For Mailonline
Hontobogo
Contract Spanish Air traffic Controller Spotted the Ukraine jet. Sacked, twitter account shut down, campaign of disinformation started.driffid
Enough evidence has been documented over the past twenty years or so to prove the CIA are capable of anything. Whether they were involved or not in this tragedy we'll never know but could they have been? You bet. Did they have a motive? Certainly. Would it have been in their interests? Absolutely.Fractal
Julie Bishop just like that other rubbish entity 60 minutes OZ condemned Russia as the culprits. They ALL ignored the witnesses on the ground clearly stating the obvious. So why?....Washington has an agenda and Australia and all NAT O countries dirtied up and fabricated evidence to frame Russia...evil psy chopaths lead our countries.onebob
Putins plane was the target and this has been know for while and I bet the USA was behind the targeting as they did to the Russian plane in Syria.Steve
Let's be reasonable. At what height was the aircraft when it was shot down? 33000 feet which is 11 kilometres or 7 miles high. Now tell me who can see a fighter jet at that distance, let alone determine whether there are two, even less credible is the statement that they saw them firing a cannon or releasing a missile. The US has their spy satellites watching the area and they KNOW what happened but are refusing to release the proof. Therefore you have to ask - are the Russians releasing these stories in the hope that the truth will be forced out of the US?George Mach
Who benefited from this tragedy: Russia or "Give me money" (Ukraine)? Answer yourselves if your not the Western propaganda`s zombies!Not a DM readerReply toGeorge Mach
What if Russia shot it down by accident? I don't believe any side shot down a passenger airliner on purpose. In which case there is no need for a motive. Or indeed, Russia or the insurgents they support could indeed have felt they were benefitting by shooting down a Ukrainian fighter jet. As for propaganda, this documentary explores all sides. You won't see anything in Russia exploring the possibility of a Russian attack. So, until your dictator stops shutting down dissenting media and 'silencing' political opposition, I think the propaganda accusation is... well, Russian propaganda by a Putin bot.echoz
A Ukrainian jet did it, and it was all caught on a US satellite, so stop blaming Russia for the horrible crime the Ukrainians have committed.Sanyang B
DM at its best, taking a 360-degree u-turn from its earlier propaganda that Putin's BUK Missile shot down the doomed airliner. Anyway, it is not the first time that CIA did something like this only State Department to quickly deploy all its PR machines in blaming USSR (now Russia) - nothing new.Tonyp
I've always doubted that the Russians did this and there absolutely no proof whatsoever that they did the people at Farnborough did not publicise their findingsMIke
This is hardly news to anyone who reads non western media.The people interviewed by the BBC about the jet was shown on BBC World news at the time of the event and subsequently "dropped" from view..That the US claims it has satellite evidence but won't reveal it even to one of the dead US victims of Kiev's terrorism tells you all you need to know...PappaSmurfer
PNAC. Plan for new American Century. TTIP. Severn countries in five years plan. America PLC are taking over the world for their N W O.KarlB
This has been known for some time they have not published the official facts. An air investigator concluded there were bullet holes across the skin of the aircraft.roman.emperor
FIRST OF ALL Ukrainian air space is controlled from Kiev so why they allowed passenger plane to fly over war area? It is obvious they wanted something to happen to blame Russians. Just simple logic is enough evidence because what would be the point for Russia to shut down passenger plane?