Did a Ukrainian fighter jet shoot down MH17? Eye witness accounts claim Boeing 777 may have been targeted by another plane
乌克兰战斗机击落马航?目击者声称看到波音777被飞机击落
Poppy Danby For Mailonline
ALEX KOSMOS
The losers: the Netherlands - for them it is an inconvenient truth - have passed their own. If the truth becomes available, then allowed, then the Ukrainians seems drained. Americans are now all the same - they are your goal - sanctions and demonization of Russia - achieved at the cost of credibility, but that trust in modern politics less and less valued. In Russia, this is true will further strengthen Putin's position.Sceadu
BBC have always been anti-Russian, they won't change orientation with no reason, so that's probably just part of the bigger game, f.e. soon this documentary will be nailed down as a lie in order to support official version or I cannot but suggest that UK simply just don't want ukranian mig/ra/n/ts, so better reveal truth than have them. Also information was released after visit of precious mr. Obama....Jedi Dan
So little is really known about this incident officially with so little details being revealed that it is unlikely we will ever know the full truth. Maybe in 50 or 60 years when everyone who may be responsible is dead will the truth come out.Iain
Nobody is going to tell the truth on this are they?Just like, in the Gulf, gossip linked the Lockerbie bombing as revenge for the downing of the Iran Air flight by the USS Vincennes.I always wondered why the Lockerbie trial was held in the Netherlands when the UK has courts.Drunkensailor
If you want to know who did it, look who benefit out of it. It's obvious.Richard Atwell
i am very sceptical of any blame giving for this type of tragedy, after all it was not that long ago our government assure us the chemical attacks in syria HAD to be Assads because the rebels couldnt have obtained them, yet here we are seeing reports of isis using those same chemicals . I am as ready to believe one side fired the missile in an act of stupid aggression as i am to believe the opposition did it so they could blame it on the other party to garner support. unless it can be undisputably proved who fired the shot then i dont see how this type of flimsy evidence can be taken seriously.