A Boeing 777 plane suddenly got into the zone of strong turbulence before starting to descend

一架波音777飞机在进入降落前突然进入强湍流区
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4461886/Turbulence-leaves-20-seriously-injured-passenger-jet.html

国外网友评论 0人跟帖    18051人参与

Darth Vader
CAT - Clear-air turbulence is usually impossible to detect with the naked eye and very difficult to detect with conventional radar, with the result that it is difficult for aircraft pilots to detect and avoid it.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
meganbelle
Regardless of if the seatbelt sign is on or not it is always reccomended to keep it fastened and not get up unless for the toilet just in case they hit any unexpected turbulence, and this is exactly why.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Edm101
Keep your seatbelt fastened. Why do people always think they know better. They only have themselves to blame
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
yve
Now people realise why the weight of bags in overhead lockers is so important. You will notice people with a heavy bag never stow them above their own heads. There is a legal maximum and it should be enforced, not ignored by the airlines. The pilot CAN refuse to fly them.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Only me
Dreadful as this is - You are always told to keep your seat belts on and they must be in view over your blankets whilst sleeping!!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Major HindsightReply toOnly me
You are not told to always keep your belt on, you may be advised to, but it's not a rule.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Kay Lowrey
The mind boggles! What the hell were passengers thinking, in the they left their seats? Turbulence is only one reason why you wear a seat belt. Bloody fools.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
bazelle
Stupid not to lease seatbelts fastened when in seat.. REALLY stupid.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
katrinajr84Reply tobazelle
Well that's helpful!! ¿¿ I'm sure they wanted this to happen... pretty sure even if they went to the toilet they had this coming. Idiot!!!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ThisdayReply tobazelle
What level of lease charge are you considering?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
McGarrigleReply tobazelle
They make it very clear that seat belts are to be used if you're in your seat. These people have only themselves to blame.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Pete Camaj
thats why i always keep my seat belt on! i loosen it but on!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
petros57
I wonder how many did not have their seat belts fastened???
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
The thinkerReply topetros57
All of the ones walking in the aisles, for a start.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Back Door BambiReply topetros57
The Thinker - Why were they walking in the aisles? It's a plane. Not a supermarket.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Sartorial Sal
Well done to the pilot for getting the plane through this. Pilots can not alter the weather
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
LizReply toSartorial Sal
But they can put the Seatbelt sign on when they hear reports of turbulence up ahead.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ChrisCooperReply toSartorial Sal
Liz, that assumes that another plane has flown through the turbulence ahead and reported it.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ScotMk
Very sad, but despite there being a no seat belt warning at the time, all planes clearly announce that if seated it is advised that you always keep your seatbelt on at all times when seated. Juse in case. Might not happen but when it does this happens.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
BOOBOO
For those saying it's their fault as they had no seatbelts, some of the injured were walking (possibly toilet) in the isle. You can't have your seatbelt on at all times.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
LambastedReply toBOOBOO
Aisle, please.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
vamppir8
No sat belts?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Major HindsightReply tovamppir8
Nah, they had seat belts, but no sat belts.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
whichway2turn
There seem to be a lot of incidents like this lately. I attended a course to combat fear of flying and they told us that commercial airline pilots are trained to fly around severe weather, even though the airplanes can take the abuse. It's because it would be too uncomfortable and frightening for normal passengers. Apparently mail or freight planes usually just fly through bad the weather, because those on-board are trained to cope with the severe turbulence. I wonder if, in an attempt to save fuel, commercial airlines are now opting to fly directly through severe weather regardless of the impact on passengers? Providing the craft survives, I can't imagine they'll lose much sleep.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
non PCReply towhichway2turn
If it is "clear air turbulence", there is nothing to fly around !
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Daschund
thank goodness the planes construction was strong enough to withstand what was obviously a violent disturbance.let us hope that those injured will recover from the terrible experience.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
mwuhaha
If you aren't moving around the cabin, you should have your seatbelt on at all times. What a terrible thing to happen.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
James Hawker
This is exactly why pilots are always belted. Clear air turbulence cannot be seen nor detected. The only heads up is when another aircraft gives a turbulence report in the same vicinity. On routes that are more remote with less traffic and you are out there essentially all alone, you are taking a big gamble as a passenger staying unbelted.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
kimmy05
Um, seat belts?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
piratecab
I've always kept my seat belt fastened
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
peter harrisonReply topiratecab
But not anymore?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
theyakutianyodeler
Unfortunately Russians love to ignore seatbelt instructions. It seems to be a cultural thing, they hate driving with them too
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]

评论

游客 请登录 注册